My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 82483
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
RES 82483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2012 4:04:54 PM
Creation date
2/29/2000 5:12:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/13/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 82-483 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING CITY COUNCIL'S COMMITMENT <br />TO HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AND BALANCED GROWTH <br />FOR PLEASANTON <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City of Pleasanton stands today at a Pivotal <br />point, a point where we must either move ahead or <br />place in jeopardy the future Drosperity of our <br />community; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />a small minority has attempted to discredit the <br />decisions of Pleasanton's duly elected representatives <br />through court proceedings rather than participating <br />in the normal, established channels the system <br />provides for public input and participation during <br />the decision-making process; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: <br /> <br /> The City Council reaffirms every councilmember's <br />commitment to the welfare and long-term prosperity <br />of Pleasanton and its citizens; and to following <br />through on the intent of the General Plan to make <br />Pleasanton a community with jobs for its residents, and <br />sufficient monies to pay for the public and cultural <br />services its citizens deserve, while still observing <br />proper concern for the environment. <br /> <br />Section 2: <br /> <br /> A flyer published by this small minority contains <br />a multitude of factual errors and misleading <br />statements, including the following: <br /> <br />The flyer claims that an assessment district <br />could raise taxes for Pleasanton citizens. <br />The truth is that the developers and companies <br />locating at the business parks in North <br />Pleasanton are the only ones the assessment <br />district will tax, not residential owners, <br />established businesses, or firms owning less <br />than two acres. <br /> <br />The flyer claims that the Council can impose <br />special taxes at will. The truth is that a <br />special tax can be adopted only upon a two- <br />thirds (2/3) vote of the Deople. As a matter <br />of fact, the fiscal imDact study shows that <br />the North Pleasanton develoDment will ~enerate <br />a surplus of tax revenue over service costs of <br />$9.1 million in the first ten years. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.