My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 83362
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
RES 83362
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 11:58:18 AM
Creation date
2/3/2000 11:09:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/23/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3590 Churchill Court <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> <br />August 29, 1983 <br /> <br />Mayor Robert Butler <br />City Hall <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> <br />Dear Bob: <br /> <br /> Please accept this letter as my resignation from the <br />Industrial General Plan Review. <br /> <br /> I am reluctant to take this action, but the recent council <br />adoption of a General Plan amendment adopting industrial <br />densities ~ in excess of what, in my judgement, is either <br />wise or meaningful convinces me of the futility of my devoting <br />any more time to this review. <br /> <br /> Bob, as you will recall, I was the first to suggest the <br />wisdom of a citizens' review of our General Plan. This sug- <br />gestion was made during the PUD hearings on the Hacienda <br />Business Park. I thought at that time, and still do, that a <br />General Plan Review was a much better format for an honest and <br />open decision of our community's future growth than any legal <br />or political action, which could be taken as a result of an <br />individual General Plan amendment adopted by the City Council. <br /> <br /> I still believe that Pleasanton would have been best <br />served by the unhampered completion of the review process and <br />am honestly mystified by the council's action in amending our <br />General Plan before the review process was complete. <br /> <br /> In my opinion, the citizens review could have been used <br />as a foram for the people of Pleasanton to decide what sort <br />of community we want and what kind of growth we are willing <br />to support. Apparently, this is not to be. <br /> <br /> I still believe a proper debate willtake place, but in <br />a format different from a General Plan Review. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Former Mayor <br /> <br />co: <br /> <br />John Innes <br />Wendy Themos <br />Chandler Lee <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.