Laserfiche WebLink
Secure concept approval on design from CALTRANS and FHWA <br />(may require concept approval on the 580/680 interchange <br />project) <br /> <br />Secure "new connection approval" from CTC and FHWA <br />(Washington D.C. level) <br /> <br />Determine the relationship with the future 1-580/I-680 <br />interchange, as above <br /> <br />Determine environmental requirements (Neg. Dec., <br />separate EIR/EIS with 580/680 project, etc.) <br /> <br />Consider use of Hacienda Business Park, Phase II EIR to <br />satisfy requirements for Stoneridge environmental <br />document <br /> <br />Determine lead agency responsibility for design -- City <br />of Pleasanton or CALTRANS <br /> <br />Establish time line for PR, R/W certification, <br />City/State Agreement, P S & E submittal, construction, <br />etc. <br /> <br />Review possibility of state participation under new <br />interchange policy (50%?) <br /> <br />Review cost estimates to insure adequate funds from the <br />NPID <br /> <br />Review design of adjacent frontage roads (State has <br />concerns) <br /> <br />4. Santa Rita Road <br /> <br />Immediately review project involving Pimlico to remove <br />conflict between city project and the proposed signal on <br />the ramp <br /> <br />Review proposed design with CALTRANS to insure early <br />concept approval due to significant R/W costs (McDonalds <br />relocation) <br /> <br />Determine relationship with proposed BART LPX line <br /> <br />Pursue idea of separate environmental document <br />Dec.) as opposed to combined document (w/other <br />interchanges) <br /> <br />(Neg. <br /> <br />Attempt to have project listed in 1984 STIP with 100% <br />local funds for design and environmental only-pursue <br />cost sharing on construction under new State Interchange <br />Policy <br /> <br />Establish ability for City to prepare P S & E, <br />regardless of cost split on construction <br /> <br />~ 3 - <br /> <br /> <br />