Laserfiche WebLink
Lastly, Councilmember McGovern voiced concern with colors of the homes, particularly a "barn red" <br /> color. She confirmed that more natural colors will be proposed and reviewed by staff. <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked to mandate photovoltaic for the homes and for the re- utilization of water <br /> prior to it being sent to the bay. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to page 5 of the specific plan and a table that shows the existing <br /> homes and maximum number of new homes in Happy Valley. He said there are 183 additional <br /> homes allowed and he questioned how many have been approved thus far. Ms. Decker said <br /> approximately 46 homes have been approved, which includes the golf course. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to an email from Kevin Close expressing concern about approving <br /> more houses in Happy Valley without the bypass road and is currently tied into the Spotorno <br /> development for funding part of the bypass road. He questioned the status of this development. Mr. <br /> Fialho said the road project is attached to the future development of the Sportono flat property. <br /> There is no active development currently, staff has had some conceptual discussions with the <br /> family. Originally the project was under contract with Greenbriar Homes who has since let the <br /> option go and their application withdrawn, and the family is re- evaluating development options. <br /> However, he did not believe anything would result in an application being considered by the City in <br /> the next 12 -24 months. He said the bypass road alignment is still an approved alignment that will <br /> require the future developer to obligate themselves to construct. The funding partner is also the City <br /> because of the golf course so it will fund part of the road. <br /> Vice Mayor Cook- Kallio referred to the open space discussion, and confirmed that the land would <br /> remain natural. She questioned the homeowners association cost to maintain this, and Ms. Decker <br /> said staff has not yet investigated this as they are generally borne by the developer. Larissa Seto, <br /> Assistant City Attorney noted that if there are further land issues regarding mitigation of the <br /> wetlands, these would want to be avoided and this was the reason the City did not want to accept it <br /> as City open space. She confirmed with the City Manager that this was County -owned <br /> unincorporated land and only Parcel A will be annexed into the City. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br /> Clancy Dutra, owner of the property, referred to page 6 of the Planning Commission minutes stating <br /> he attended Pleasanton Elementary school when it was up on the hill, he attended Amador High <br /> School when there were 300 students, he was not able to bring his consultant, Don Babbitt to the <br /> meeting but his civil engineer is present and can answer any questions. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. <br /> Councilmember McGovern questioned the condition for well removal, and Ms. Decker referred to <br /> Condition 50, and well is covered under the engineering requirements. She confirmed with Ms. <br /> Decker that the condition can be amended to indicate that "it be used for landscape purposes only." <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Hosterman/Thorne to introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. <br /> 1990 approving PUD -77, Dutra Trust, with added conditions as follows: <br /> Condition 11: Add "t" to the word, "no." <br /> Condition 14: Amend recycling of construction from 75% to be "80 <br /> Condition 29: Delete the statement about possible damages to impacts. <br /> Condition 50: Add wording to state that the well can only be used for landscape purposes <br /> only. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 20 April 21, 2009 <br />