My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
051909
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2009 12:43:53 PM
Creation date
5/14/2009 1:16:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Byde stated that there has always been a high demand for the complex, currently at <br />96 percent occupancy, which is the main purpose for the application to add units and <br />improve on -site facilities. He confirmed that affordable units will not be concentrated in <br />any one location. He also reported that prior to submitting their application, they <br />conducted a survey for residents in March of 2008, and the residents were <br />overwhelmingly supportive of the project with 185 pro, 3 opposed, and 58 indifferent, 16 <br />vacant units. He stated that they believe the project is unique as it will cause little <br />disruption to residents and will enhance onsite facilities and provide affordable housing. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that it was a great project. <br />Commission Narum indicated that she was favorably impressed, particularly with the <br />amenities for the tenants. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Mr. Byde and stated that this would be a win -win <br />situation. <br />Chair Pearce stated that this was a good project. <br />Commissioner Blank moved to find that the proposed PUD Development Plan <br />modification conforms to the applicable goals and policies of the Pleasanton <br />General Plan, to make PUD Development Plan Findings 1 through 6 stated in the <br />Planning Commission staff report, and to recommend approval of Case PUD -84- <br />21-04M to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit <br />A of the staff report. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Fox and O'Connor. <br />Resolution No. PC- 2009 -10 recommending approval for PUD- 84- 21 -04M was <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 25, 2009 Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.