13 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Fox and Olson. NOES: Commissioners Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. The motion failed. Mr. Roush stated that conditions could be added to the use permit, including a condition to require that the parking spaces at 1236 Quarry Lane be signed and paid for by the applicant. He noted that there is already a condition for children to remain in the waiting area, but the sign-in and sign-out condition could be a way to keep the children in the building until their parents arrive. Commissioner Fox stated that it was her understanding, based on problems with previous applications, that an adjacent property cannot be conditioned to do something. Mr. Roush clarified that the Commission would be obligating the applicant at 1228 Quarry Lane to pay for something at 1236 Quarry Lane, if this were acceptable to the owner of 1236 Quarry Lane. Commissioner Narum moved to make the required conditional use findings for PCUP-237 as listed in the staff report, and approve the project subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A of the staff report and in the staff memo dated February 25, 2009, with the addition of the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall require children aged 12 years and under to be signed into and signed out of the facility by a parent, guardian, or adult supervisor; (2) The applicant shall require the instructors to park on the street in order to free up the parking spaces in front of the music studio for students; and (3) The applicant shall be required to paint-mark the parking spaces on the south side of 1236 Quarry Lane, if acceptable to the owner, as designated parking spaces for 1236 Quarry Lane only. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Commissioner Fox stated that she would not support the motion. She noted that PUD-I and I-zoned areas are for manufacturing and industrial operations, and businesses will not want to locate in the Quarry or Valley Business Park with children's facilities for liability reasons. She added that this limits where light industrial businesses can locate. Chair Pearce stated that she would support the motion and added that she would not be pleased if the application came back before the Commission because the conditions were violated. EXCERPTS: PLANNING CGMMISSION MINUTES. February 25, 2009 Page 6 of 7