Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Darmsted if there was adequate parking on his <br />property, and Mr. Darmsted replied that there was no parking problem. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that the applicant is asking for a use permit that would <br />allow for five instructors at the same time, which means that there may be five students <br />at the site as well. Mr. Darmsted said they were asking to have a total of five instructors <br />who would come and go, some of whom would teach only one or two days a week, <br />unlike in a school where they teach all day during the week. He confirmed, however, <br />that there is a possibility that there could be five instructors at any one time. <br />Commissioner Narum reiterated that the applicant is requesting a use permit for five <br />instructors at the same time, which would potentially mean that five students could be <br />on-site at the same time, thereby using a potential of ten parking spaces. She noted <br />that there are four spaces available in front of the facility and that this is a parking issue. <br />She agreed that children running around in the parking lot is a problem and that one <br />solution would be to require the instructors to park on the street so the spaces in front of <br />the business would be available to the students. She added that the children could also <br />be required to be signed in and out and that they stay inside the building until they are <br />picked up. <br />Mr. Darmsted stated that the teachers have already been asked to park on the street <br />and that two of them take public transit and do not drive. He added that parents have <br />signed contracts and have been told that children may not be left there unattended. He <br />reiterated that he believed there was no parking problem. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Fox moved to deny Case PCUP-237. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />Chair Pearce indicated that she would not support the motion, given the strict conditions <br />to be placed on the project, the neighboring property owner's recourse, the fact there <br />have been no complaints, and staff's impression of the parking situation and <br />documented spaces. She stated that she was inclined to provide the applicant a <br />second chance to show that the business can run well with expansion. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted there are many facilities in the Quarry Lane Business <br />Park that have children in a mixed-use building and that he would also not support the <br />motion. He added that he would like to include the condition that children be signed in <br />and out. <br />Commissioner Narum said she would not support the motion as there were similar uses <br />in the park and that the added conditions would address the concerns. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, F=ebruary z5, 2009 Page 5 of 7 <br />