Laserfiche WebLink
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Rimma Radayeva, Radayeva Music Studio, stated that she pertormed administrative <br />work in the studio during weekday mornings and that there were no students in the <br />facility at that time. She added that weekends were flexible with classes starting <br />between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. She noted that she had placed a sign on her door <br />instructing her patrons not to park on the spaces in front of 1236 Quarry Lane and that <br />she believed the owner at 1236 Quarry Lane was satisfied with the sign. She indicated <br />that she was amenable to adding a condition in her policy for students regarding parking <br />restrictions. <br />Chris Studzinski, owner of 1236 Quarry Lane, expressed his objection to having <br />non-industrial uses in the business park. He noted that there is a stucco business and <br />roofing company with large trucks next door to the piano studio and that he was <br />concerned about the children's safety playing in the area. He stated that the studio has <br />expanded, and children wait for their parents outside to pick them up. He added that he <br />has had parking and loitering problems for many years and described a situation where <br />a child threw tanbark at his windows while a parent was standing by. He noted that five <br />teachers at one time would be using five parking spaces, and five students would <br />require an additional five spaces. He acknowledged the conditions regarding parking <br />but doubted they could be enforced. He indicated that while he agreed music <br />instruction is great, he was opposed to the expansion because he did not believe an <br />industrial park was a good location for the facility. He suggested that the business <br />relocate to a more appropriate location such as at the Vintage Hills Shopping Center <br />where he believed there was already a dance studio and where the students can wait <br />for the parents in Tawny Park across the street. He noted that the property association <br />which supports the studio is not the business park association but the tenant's building <br />association. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Fox expressed her reservations about the operation and questioned <br />some of the use permits approved by the Commission in industrial areas. She noted <br />that the first businesses approved in industrial areas were fairly benign and did not <br />present a problem until Pump-It-Up came in. She indicated that she could not support <br />the application because of impacts to light industrial/manufacturing districts and that she <br />would prefer to see the studio locate in a retail zone or commercial district Downtown or <br />similar locations. <br />Chair Pearce inquired what the recourse of the adjacent property owner would be if <br />conditions were added but not followed by the applicant. Ms. Decker replied that as <br />with all other approvals, this would be a Code Enforcement matter. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if there have been complaints received from others in <br />the business park. Ms. Decker replied that none had been received. <br />EXCERPTS: PL,vNNING CGMMISSION MINUTES, rebruary 25, 2009 Page 2 of 7 <br />