My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
042109
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2009 2:33:03 PM
Creation date
4/15/2009 2:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
proposed development is sensitive to the site's unusual conditions the seasonal <br />drainages, wetland area and the southwestern portion of the site would be located within <br />the open space parcel. Staff has concluded that the proposal merits the exceptio9n to the <br />one acre minimum lot size allowed by the Specific Plan. <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance <br />The City's Inclusionary housing ordinance exempts projects of 15 units or less. <br />However, the applicant is required to pay for the low-income housing fees per the Master <br />Fee Schedule for Development Fees as adopted by the City Council. <br />Growth Management <br />The proposed residential lots covered by this development would fall under the "First <br />Come, First Served" category of the city's Growth Management programs. <br />Design and Site Development Standards <br />Proposed Design Guidelines: The proposed design guidelines have been written to be <br />similar to the design guidelines of both the Mariposa Ranch at Callippe Preserve and <br />Serenity at Callippe Preserve. The design criteria contained in the proposed design <br />guidelines are detailed and comprehensive. The guidelines include the setbacks, building <br />height, and floor area ratio for the development aad it also covers the recommended <br />architectural styles, landscaping, fencing, etc. The detail of architectural elements, such <br />as dormers, shutters, bay windows, roofline, etc., ensures successful translation from <br />guideline statements to physical designs. Staff believes that the proposed guidelines <br />provide a comprehensive level of detail and direction for future homeowners regarding <br />all aspects of the designs of their homes. <br />The design guidelines also recognize the topographic constraints for Lots 2, 3 and 5, <br />where the sites do not exhibit a knoll suitable for an area suitable for on-grade <br />construction. To prevent excessive grading, the design guidelines include split-level <br />requirements for these lots. <br />Design Guidelines Review Procedures: The review of the home designs for these lots <br />would be administered by atwo-step process. <br />1. An "in-house" review conducted by the development's Design Review Board <br />(DRB) to ensure consistent to the design guidelines. The design plans would <br />be approved by DRB before being submitted to City staff for review. <br />Case No. PUD-77 Planning Commission <br />Page - 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.