12 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

She indicated that she understood the exception and limitations of the parcel and that she likes the way the project is laid out. She added that she likes the open space which meets the rural character of the area. Commissioner Blank moved to find that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and that the proposed Planned Unit Development plan is consistent with the General Plan and the PUD ordinance; to make the PUD findings listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration and Case PUD-77 to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval as listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, with the modifications that the Condition No. 40 include the standard language for the installation of an automatic sprinkler system and the addition of the standard conditions for the green building requirement and the provision for future photovoltaic system. Ms. Decker noted that the Commission also discussed the deletion of Condition No. 14 regarding project phasing, the modification of Condition No. 31 relative to construction on Saturdays, and the modification of Condition No. 51 to clarify the Zone 7 requirements should the existing well be removed. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Commissioner Narum noted some typographical errors that she requested be corrected: (1) Condition No. 11, change the word "note" on the next to the last line to "not". (2) Conditions Nos. 20 and 21, change the word "following" in "the applicant shall strictly following..." to "follow." She added that she would support the project noting that she did not think about the argument that four of the lots could be turned into one-acre lots by moving the boundary to the west and getting into the drainage, which she did not support doing. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: Commissioner Fox. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC-2009-02 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration and PC-2009-03 recommending approval of Case PUD-77 were entered and adopted as motioned and amended. EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 14, 2009 Page 10 of 10