My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
040709
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2009 1:08:32 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 12:52:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Set forth below are the questions staff has received from the Planning Commission <br />concerning the Vineyard Villa residential conversion, and staff's responses thereto. <br />After the conversion date (i.e., the date that the first lot sells), are the then <br />existing residents allowed to continue to rent? <br />Response: After the conversion date, the residents then living in the park, if they <br />choose not to purchase their lot, may remain on the property and continue to rent. If a <br />resident is considered a lower income household, under state law the rents may be <br />raised, but are limited to the average monthly increase in rent in the four years <br />preceding the conversion. For residents who do not qualify as lower income <br />households, the preconversion rent may be increased to market level, in equal <br />installments over a four year period (i.e., 20% annually). <br />2. Is the conversion simply a way for the park owner to get out of local rent control? <br />Response: A park owner may be motivated for a variety of reasons to convert a mobile <br />home park to residential. Potentially the owner, if he/she is able to sell all of the lots, <br />may receive more money than if the park were sold intact. In light of the state law, one <br />effect of the conversion is that the owner's ability to charge rents will be set by the state <br />law, rather than local law. As mentioned in Response No. 1, state law does allow the <br />park owner to raise rents to market level for households that are not lower income, <br />albeit over a four year period. <br />3. If this conversion is approved, will the residents (who are seniors) living in the <br />Park be evicted? <br />Response: No; see Response No. 1. <br />4. Will conversion of the Park decrease the number of affordable units in the City by <br />208? <br />Response: See discussion on page 5 of the memo concerning "Loss of Affordable <br />Housing". <br />5. Has the City Council expressed an interest to convert mobile home parks to <br />residential ownership? <br />Response: No. <br />6. Why is this a vesting tentative map application? <br />Response: This application, in addition to converting the park to residential ownership, <br />seeks to create a final map and, eventually, a recorded condominium plan creating 208 <br />condominiums. A tentative map application is the proper procedural device to create <br />these lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.