Laserfiche WebLink
t x ~ n c v~ o ~ u i i o n s <br />breakers ace rated a[ ~t1O :Amp. (one each for die Operations Service Center, Police Range and Support <br />Services. <br />\V~ell No. 8 is on PG&li's .A-C rate schedule and i. screed be a single metes kith rno electrical senicc <br />panels cads ~~i~h -F80~377 ~~olt, Ihree phase service «-id~ main breakers rated a~ BUII .1u~ps. _A PV" <br />scstcm can tic into the };rid ~ciih an iu~~cn cc at 377V' or ~SflV' at both nc~ <)SC and \V~cll No. 8 meter. <br />:An deci cical cufdnccr should conduct a held inspection and eonhrm the cleat rival iulormation prior to <br />Pt' scstcm deign and installation. I~urthcr invesrigarion is required to deicrmiuc the clccu~ical service <br />panel bus capaciic and the appropriate method to tic dac proposed PV' scsicros imu the electrical grid. <br />Representative PV System <br />hhe auaksis at each site is based on the Pt' scstcm described beloce. IF the Cin of Pleasantm <br />implenunis the proposed projcU, coulcaclurs ma_c provide PV' designs that care h~om nc~ <br />rcprescntative scstcm uud in ibis analcsis. <br />PV Components <br />I'hc representarice PV' module iu this auaksis is the I~.ca'grecn Solar I?S-19051. PV' moduli. '1'hesc <br />375" ~ 61.8" modtdcs have a rating of 108.8 ~c:uts uudcc the California lincrgc Commission's (CISC) <br />phorovohaic module PV'l'S.A "fcst Conditions (P'fO`. Pot moss PV' projccl s, such as [hose proposed <br />for the Cilc of Pleasanton OSC sire, module cost and availabilitc at the time ut installation kill be nc~ <br />main amsideratious Eor the actual module selection. The peeformauce of cyuicalcutic-sired modules <br />horn differcm mauulacmrers is genecalk the same Phis stuck assumes the degradation of dectcici~c <br />ourhur from these modules to be US percent annu;dlc, ~chich is a geucralk accepted industrc ^verage. <br />SatCom Poker scstcm iucericrs sore used in the initial solar scstcm ckr.-ilm for bosh the OSC and the <br />VV'ell No. 8 scstcm. SatCom Poker Scs~em Im~ertere ~cere chosen because Thee have some of the <br />highest efficiencies across a range of inverter sizes. The actual inserter size chosen railed bet~cecn nc~ <br />nco scsicros io pcoperk match the dif9crences in solar s~sicm size. <br />Mounting <br />fhc lilac OtiC buildings eurrentk planned to hold PV' modules bare a roof ~ciih a slope of I~ I °_ crhich <br />is appro~imardc d.7C degrees. ~Chis lose-slope roof could scree as nc~ platform for reconaueuded flush <br />mourn arrangement ~chieh invokes mounting the PV' pauds thish kith die c~isting roof. <br />1 ^ush mourn PV" arras masimires scstcm IcAC~ capacitc because more modules can be placed in a <br />given space without shading umsideraiious (torn adjacent nunlules. In addition, flush uxnuuiug is the <br />simplest and icpicallc nc~ least c~pensice mounting angle. <br />Uthough PV" arracs mounted at steeper angles produce uwre clcctricitc per module than lo~c-slope <br />flush nuxuved uvxlules, sizing the pV' scstcm to produce the moll local clcctricitc is die prinuvc <br />I~~.ur~~n>~~Lir PAii ~JrJ c.h.n~luh nn~diJr~ul~i~im~.mJ l~n~i r~ih~ i~~nt~ni J.,i~, o~~.~n.i:nil~l~l'\m~,.liJ, ~. <br />I h~Ln~~ >11~m:.nn n ~-alt>in in.Jl~r: mi~•rnn ntJ ii h.~~i frv wi nisi ~ru iinin:~. <br />~t lt. I'It I'\~~a~m rtinrn;ci>urtJ nnJ,rl'VI~AI,y ~. ~nJiin,n- l•.in~lnmlarnuri ~d 1111 .: r!, L.inu ~~(t torn <br />~~.iii, in.nr onl uiu. ..<<i ~vl~~.w irni~r ILA I'I~ i.iim i. inr~l ~~,h ~ in~in.li~i.lu.il l'\ nn~LJ ~,~iLnininr,. <br />I h~ iJ~ I i li irv~'~~ 1. n ~ :nvl m,. innn.J , n l hu torn ~a.~ I'\ im ~Jnl,<i, ihr I iu .q the I ni~,,.i ".bit I~. i- <br />{~~~n ~~in L i.I~i.J ~~ hJv nr~' ~ r, ~I I ~. .:un~~n. <br />