Laserfiche WebLink
f X! P L Y~ ~ L II 1 1 0 X 2 <br />Conclusions <br />Based on the siic fcasibilitc and financial anah sis, I(S recommends that if du Ci~c is nwii~ aicd ro <br />dcmonsunrc a commitment to rcnc~cablc cncrgc and bcvcGt ~iom a small cost savings for solar PV' <br />deri~-ed eiecn-icin-, die Cin- pursue a annhiued 3C,-F lcAC' PV' s~~su~m (39 IcAV~ ro scree the OSC and 27~ <br />k\\ w sen~e AC~ell No. 8) using a third parrs o~~ nership strue~ure ~~ithin a poker purchasing agreement <br />(P P:A). Because some of the beneFu of .,talc and (i~deral ia~ incentives that accrue to nc~ third park <br />o-iIL be passed on ro nc~ Cin- in some fashion, This arrangement is likeL_r to result in nc~ lowest Pt' <br />energc cost m the Cin. '1'hc l'car I cost savings of nc~ solar clectriein- is estimated io he Sllli). 'I'bis <br />mst saciugs would be iucecascd if urilin~ else nicin- rates inurasc more yuiekLv than this analysis <br />assumes. _ . <br />