16 - Laserfiche WebLink

s x i e c v a o i u r i o x s 14rderal (3~ percent) and Stare (ft.8~ percent) tai ou CSI inceuti~~c PP.A Rare of SU.183~k\V~h ~ciih a F percent annual escalator l'rilin- clcctricitc at PG&I~: I~:19SS schedule Eor the OSC and :AC schedule fen-A\i~ll No. 8 kith -1 percent annual escalawr • Project Resrmies CSI Inccnricc of Sll?3~1;AA~h State depreciation (I°_ scar s~raighi lice) 14:dcral accelerated depreciation user sis scars (~L1CR5) I~cderal tai credit oC ihiric percent of the project cost in the first ccar (aualcsis assumes third parts opener has a tai liabilitc high euou},.h to claim full raz a-edit) SUMMARY 'fable B sho~cs the net present caluc of all ibrce sccuarios. "1'he Status ouo scenario for the OSC ciclds the highest (least negatiec) net Ares cot ~~aluc. 1'he I'P.1 ahernaiice Cot the USC represents a SSd,flnp pccmium for the benefit of milizing solar po~ccr ai the site, ~chercas nc~ outright o~~-ncrship sccoario represents a S I R~ llf Ill premium o~z•r 311 ~~ears. The PP_A scenario for AC2~Il Diu. 8 ciclds the highest (least negari~ c) net present ~ aloe. ~Chc Status Ouo alternaii~~c Cur A\ell No. 8 represenr< a S3(13,Ullfl premium for the failure to utilize solar po~cee ai the site, ohnras the outright o~~mership scenario represents a S3n11 UOl1 premium u~-cr 3U scars. ~fhe ccar one cost differential for PP.1 clectriciic is estimated io be S8;11111 more for the OSC and SS,JOII less li>r AC~cll No. 8 compared to the Cin-'s present utilia- rare resulting i^ a net savings of $IU11 for PP.A clectricia-. I lo~~-cecr, these calculations arc highlc ckpcudem un the assumed escalation of arilin- clcctricitc rates. _As the utilitc rate escalation inarascs rclaiicc to the PP.A escalation n~re, the PV' sccuarios' huancial numbers improve rclati~~c to the tiGims Ouo alternati~-c because the cost of the YV' scstem's clectriein~ generation is not affected be utilitc miss. 1s a basis for comparison,'fablc 9 sho~cs the cos[ for PP.A clcctricitc compared to uiili~c sourced clcctricitc for the <)SC and VCcll Nn. ft in _ccar 1, ~, IU, I5, and 3i1. 1'hc iota] cs~ima~cd cost sa~~ings for PP.A clcctricitc is S3,Gnp o~~cr 3U scars. Table 9: Premium for PPA Electricity - t t Utility Cost $ 13,600 $ 15,600 $ 18,500 $ 22,000 _ _$ 26,100 OSC PPA Cost 22 000 25 300_ _. _ $_.30,000 $_ 35 600 $ 42 200 Utility Cost $ 76,300 $ 87,500 $ 103,900 $ 123,200 $ 146,200 Well No 8 pPA Cost 67 800 77 800 92 300 109 500 129 900 Combined Cost Savings for PPA Electricity $ 100 $0 $100 $100 $ 200 Table 8: Net Present Value (NPV)