My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
040709
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2009 12:12:42 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 12:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"deficits." Likewise if revenues are more then anticipated and/or if expenditures were <br />less then projected, a credit will be made to future years that minimize the need for an <br />adjustment in a specific cost center or reserve. For the rate period beginning in 2004, <br />both revenues and expenditures were less then projected. However, the revenue <br />shortfall was in excess of the expenditures savings which resulted in an operating deficit <br />of approximately $2.5 million dollars that is subject to recapture from future service <br />rates. <br />In addition to the above, the refuse and recycling business has been volatile and subject <br />to significant price fluctuations for recyclable materials, increased landfill costs, and <br />increased regulatory costs including fees. Finally, the most recent downturn in the <br />economy has resulted in significant reductions in commercial revenues, particularly <br />construction related, that has impacted total revenues. <br />It should also be noted that rate adjustments are typically approved for a period of three <br />years which would have resulted in an adjustment in 2007. However, due to the time <br />required to develop the recycling program and the collection of data to address the rate <br />adjustment for existing services, no rate adjustment occurred until June 2008. As <br />indicated at the time, that rate adjustment was interim and approved to address a <br />number of known financial issues that required more immediate funding. As a result, <br />revenue projections made in 2004 to cover the years through 2007, were unable to take <br />into account a significant number of cost increases that occurred from 2007 through the <br />current time. <br />Staff and the Subcommittee have reviewed the status of these reserves and cost <br />centers and determined that at this time, in accordance with the terms of the franchise, <br />a rate adjustment is appropriate. A summary of the PGS related 13% residential <br />increase is as follows: <br />74% to address governmental regulatory costs (none of which are assessed by the <br />City) associated with the refuse operations. Currently, PGS is assessed regulatory <br />per ton landfill usage fees from a number of governmental agencies, including as the <br />Alameda County Waste Management Authority, Alameda County Measure D, the <br />State of California, etc. Since 2007, these fees have increased from $15.26/ton to <br />$16.26/ton (6.5%). In addition, PGS estimates these fees, which are based in part <br />on CPI formulas, will continue to increase over the next two years of this rate term. <br />The rate adjustment to cover these fee increases represents a "pass through" to <br />cover these costs. <br />1.2% to address dump fee related costs including recently adopted and projected <br />increases at the Vasco Road Landfill. Since 2007, non regulatory costs at the Vasco <br />Road landfill have increased from $14.63/ton to $18.27/ton (24.8%). In addition, <br />PGS anticipates rates will increase by an additional 6% to 10% during this rate term. <br />The rate adjustment to cover these fee increases represents a "pass through" to <br />cover these costs. <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.