My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
032309
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2009 10:30:59 AM
Creation date
3/20/2009 10:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/23/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
taken into account the actual budget gap is $4,429,198. Table 3 listed later in this <br />report highlights the source of revenue reductions and the recommended adjustments. <br />To address the $4,429,198 budget shortfall, staff is recommending four specific actions <br />for rebalancing the General Fund budget. In addition, staff is recommending an <br />increase in operating reserves to help assure the City is in a position to address future <br />financial issues, should they occur. The recommended actions are as follows: <br />• Re-prioritize and extend Replacement Plan expenditures thereby reducing the <br />required annual General Fund contributions in 2008-09. <br />• Maintain a position vacancy target by not automatically filling positions when they <br />become vacant but by analyzing each vacancy to determine if it is critical to <br />maintain core service levels. <br />• Update overhead charges from the General Fund to the Enterprise Funds to <br />ensure the cost of providing services to Enterprise Funds is fully recovered <br />• Departmental operating budget reductions that do not impact core service levels. <br />Details of this action are listed in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1.Recommended Actions to Re-Balance General Fund Budget <br />Plan Contributions ~ (3,172,91 <br />on <br />IUptlate Charges to Enterprise Funds I (43.59011 <br />In addition to the above, staff is also recommending an adjustment to the City Capital <br />Improvement Program (CIP). Since FY 1997-98, the General Fund's contribution to the <br />CIP has been divided into two components. The first component is an annual <br />ongoing contribution intended to remain somewhat constant through build-out. The <br />goal of this component is to eventually create a stable contribution to reflect capital <br />needs. However, as new major capital projects are brought on-line and the <br />City approaches facility build-out, it is anticipated that this contribution will be reduced to <br />cover the cost of operating the new facilities. The second General Fund component <br />comes from the availability of "one-time" revenues. The current CIP includes $3 million <br />from this source which was placed in the Capital Improvement Reserve (CIPR). The <br />CIPR was established by the City Council in FY 2006-07 as a funding source for high <br />priority projects. As a result, this funding is not encumbered to a specific project. <br />Currently the CIPR has a balance of $4,973,266 before taking this action. <br />To address staff concerns regarding future financial impacts, staff is recommending that <br />the $3 million transferred from the General Fund to the CIPR as part of the Mid-Term <br />budget, be redirected back into the Temporary Recession Reserve which will increase <br />this reserve from $7.9 million to $10.9 million. This is a preventative measure to <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.