Laserfiche WebLink
homes. Mr. Dolan confirmed that the FAR restrictions would allow additions but only on the <br />larger lots. Councilmember McGovern asked if the conditions need to state a maximum height <br />of 30 feet when the staff report says 26.5 feet. Mr. Dolan said no but also noted that it is less <br />than what is allowed by R1-6500. <br />Councilmember McGovern expressed concern that residents may purchase their homes with <br />the expectations of creating an addition and asked that the conditions of approval more <br />specifically state which lots could support that. Mr. Dolan said that disclosure of each lot's FAR <br />and FAR requirements should sufficiently address that issue. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked the applicant to later address the costs associated with <br />maintenance of the community that will be realized by HOA fees. <br />Councilmember McGovern expressed concern over the proximity of certain lots to the OSC. <br />She asked if Condition 15 is a result of similar concerns and if the replacement of the sound wall <br />between the proposed development and the OSC is intended to increase the ability to reduce <br />noise associated with the firing range. Mr. Dolan said that Condition 15 moves lots 92 and 93 as <br />far north as possible due to their location and proximity to the OSC in general but agreed that <br />noise is a contributing factor. <br />Associate Planner Steve Otto explained that the proposed grading along lots 93 and 94 will <br />require the installation of a five foot retaining along the OSC. A new sound wall would be placed <br />on top of that, resulting in increased wall height which could certainly be a benefit to sound <br />mitigation. <br />Councilmember McGovern reiterated her concern over noise emanating from the OSC firing <br />range, noted that the noise study indicates firing of shotguns and handguns could last for seven <br />days with six people firing at any one time and decibel levels rising to second stories. She asked <br />if either of the homes on those lots would be two-stories. Mr. Dolan said there are no restrictions <br />on the number of stories for those lots. He acknowledged the findings of the noise report and <br />added that staff supports the included noise mitigation measures. <br />Councilmember McGovern pointed out that the study very specifically lists the construction <br />requirements necessary for those mitigations and asked if the same consultant who crafted the <br />study will oversee those mitigations. Mr. Dolan could not confirm that the exact same consultant <br />would be used but assured her that the report would be made available to the appropriate <br />parties and staff will ensure that those homes are livable. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked to increase the job construction demolition site to 75% in <br />accordance with recent decisions. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned the estimate of 5.33 trips per household per day, noting <br />that most households contain at least two people and two cars. She expressed concern that the <br />traffic fees collected will be based on numbers that are too low and that actual traffic could <br />eventually have a greater impact on both Santa Rita Road and Valley Road. <br />Mr. Dolan explained that while 55+ housing is relatively new and related traffic studies are <br />limited, they have shown that these communities ultimately result in fewer vehicle trips than a <br />standard residential neighborhood and of that use. The majority tends to occur outside peak <br />traffic operating hours. He added that the traffic impact fees associated with this project use one <br />of the highest rates he has seen and suggested that may offset any unanticipated impacts. <br />City Council Minutes Page 11 of 19 February 17, 2009 <br />