My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04 ATTACHMENT 10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
022409
>
04 ATTACHMENT 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 2:42:11 PM
Creation date
2/20/2009 11:55:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04 ATTACHMENT 10
Document Relationships
10
(Cross Reference)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2009\020309
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br />Provided to the City Council <br />Mary Lu Campbell After Distribution of packet <br />From: Mary Lu Campbell Date <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:09 PM <br />To: <br />co: Nelson Fialho; Maria Hoey; Cheryl Cook -Karllio; Cinder 1cGovern; Jennifer Ho termarn; Jerry Thorne; Matt <br />Sullivan <br />Subject: RE- Stonerige Extension - Vote No! <br />February 3, 2009 <br />Dear Mr. aslarna: <br />Thank you for your message expressing your opposition to the extension of Stoneridge Drive. Be assured ar copy of your <br />message is being provided to the Mayor and Members of the City Council so they may have the benefit of your opinion. <br />Mary Lu Campbell <br />Executive Assistant <br />City of Pleasanton <br />P.O. Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 34566 -0802 <br />From: Darn Maslana <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:38 � <br />To: Mayor and City Council List <br />Subject: Stonerige Extension - Vote o! <br />Members of the Council - I have one question ... hove did we go from the council being ready to vote the <br />extension out of the City Plan throe short }roam ago to now ramming it down the throats of Pleasanton residents <br />without a City vote? Can anyone one of you explain to me how are city benefits from this extension? The most <br />recent traffic study was based on SIX different assumptions and NONE of them exists today or anytime soon. <br />So, you are obligated to explain to the public why this is a good idea ... and you CAN IT use the traffic study <br />a evidence until those �I� ass <br />um tions are in place. The most accurate traffic study to date is the T -Angle <br />study which showed 0% cut through highway traffic. . Please be honest and tell the public the true reason you <br />favor this Charnber of Commerce idea. If you push forward I GAURANTEE we will refer end your decision to <br />put the road through. Just like the most recent election QQ ors PP, you will lose. Please finally accept the <br />simple fact that every time Pleasanton residents have a chance to voice their opinion, they vote AGAINST <br />MORE DEVELOPMENT. Isn't it your job to listien to the public? The biggest decision to face our City in the <br />last 3 o }ream deserves to be on the ballot for people to decide ... not three council members who have recie ed <br />large carn argn contribution from the Chamber of Commerce. <br />Sincerely, <br />an Dias 1 ana <br />2266 Greenwood Road <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />21312009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.