My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2009 4:42:09 PM
Creation date
2/11/2009 4:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
According to the Community Care Licensing Division of the State Department of Social <br />Services (DSS), the applicant's use is exempt from the requirement to obtain State <br />licensing. Per Section 101158 of Title 22, facilities are eligible for an exemption if they <br />serve school-age children (children over the age of four years and nine months) who <br />attend sessions that total no more than 15 hours or more per week for each child, or, if <br />the school-age children are enrolled in sessions (with no limit on hours per week) that <br />are 12 weeks or less in duration. Children may be enrolled in back-to-back sessions as <br />long as they are re-enrolled at the end of a 12-week session. <br />The Planning Commission had a lengthy discussion on the State exemption. <br />Commissioner Fox felt strongly that the proposed facility does not qualify for the exempt <br />status as she believes the exemption is intended to be granted for "recreation" facilities <br />only. <br />Staff has concluded that in this case, the procedures and practices for issuing waivers <br />of State requirements are not for the City to determine. In light of the State waiver, staff <br />believes that all substantive concerns about the operation of the Little Ivy League facility <br />have been addressed through the recommended conditions of approval. <br />OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION <br />The following are options that the Council may wish to consider and/or discuss: <br />Option No. 1: <br />Determine that the Planning Commission action, including conditions, is appropriate. <br />While the majority of the Commission felt that the proposed facility did not require a <br />State childcare license, the Commission wanted to ensure that appropriate and <br />necessary protections would be provided and, therefore, imposed the following specific <br />requirements: <br />All adults working at the facility shall obtain CPR and First Aid training; <br />All adults working at the facility shall undergo a criminal background investigation; <br />A disaster plan should be in place; and <br />• A plan providing fresh air access to all students shall be implemented. <br />This option would allow the applicant to operate as a tutorial facility without a childcare <br />license but would impose similar local requirements that would be imposed by the State <br />were the facility to pursue a childcare license. <br />Option No. 2: <br />Determine that the facility is a childcare center. <br />If the proposed use is categorized as a childcare center, the following would need to be <br />in place prior to operation: <br />• A modification to the Hacienda Business Park PUD. The current PUD approval <br />does not allow a childcare center to be located in the district either as a permitted <br />use or as a conditionally permitted use. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.