My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
020309
>
10 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2009 11:23:47 AM
Creation date
1/28/2009 11:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/3/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 ATTACHMENTS
Document Relationships
04
(Cross Reference)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2009\022409
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />FINDINGS FOR ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN THE EIR <br />During the preparation of the EIR for the proposed Project, the City evaluated several <br />alternatives. A description and a finding for each alternative are presented below. <br />No Project Alternative (No Build) <br />Description <br />The existing Project Area would remain as it currently exists. None of the project <br />components (i.e., auto mall, senior continuing care community, commercial center, <br />community park, and neighborhood park/detention basin) would be constructed. With <br />the No Project Alternative, the existing Project Area would remain undeveloped, thereby <br />failing to satisfy the project objective to develop the site with economically beneficial <br />land uses. It is unlikely that the Project Area would remain undeveloped far into the <br />future, since development of the area has already been approved as part of the 1989 <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan; however, in the short term for the purposes of this <br />alternative, the area would remain unbuilt. <br />Finding: Infeasible <br />By preventing development of the Project Area, the No Project Alternative would avoid <br />or substantially reduce the significant and unavoidable impacts of the proposed project <br />to aesthetics and visual quality, air quality, and traffic. <br />This alternative is infeasible, however, because it is inconsistent with the City's planning <br />goals. A no development alternative would fail to make responsible use of a site that <br />has previously been planned by the City for urban uses for almost 20 years. It would <br />not comply with the direction of Pleasanton's General Plan for urban uses of the project <br />site and would fail to implement a Specific Ptan that has already been approved by the <br />City. <br />The No Project Alternative is also infeasible because it is inconsistent with the <br />objectives of the proposed project, which include, among others, guiding the <br />development of the Staples Ranch site with a mix of economically beneficial uses, <br />retaining existing auto sales businesses within the City, providing senior continuing care <br />amenities, and providing community recreational facilities. <br />Existing Specific Plan Alternative <br />Description <br />Under the Existing Specific Plan Alternative, the land uses that were approved as part <br />of the 1989 Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (1989 Specific Plan) for the Project Area <br />would be developed. Of the 124 acres that comprise the Staples Ranch site, 1.5 acres <br />that lie within the City of Pleasanton would remain zoned as PUD-Medium Density <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment and Staples Ranch Project <br />Environmental Impact Report Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Page 4 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.