Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> STAFF <br /> REPORT <br /> <br />4O <br /> <br />March 27, 1984 <br /> <br />HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL <br />Pleasanton, California <br /> <br />Re: Revised Emergency Operations Organizational Structure and <br /> Operational Concepts of the Basic Emergency Operations Plan <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and Hembers of the Council: <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The City's Basic Emergency Operations Plan, originally adopted in June 1967 <br />by Resolution #67-134, was last updated in 1981. Since that time numerous <br />changes have occurred that makes it again necessary to update this document. <br /> <br />The purposes of the Plan are to: <br /> <br />1. Provide a basis for the conduct and coordination of operations and the <br /> management of critical resources during emergencies. <br /> <br />2. Establish a mutual understanding of the authority, responsibilities, <br /> functions, and operations of civil government during emergencies. <br /> <br />Provide a basis for incorporating into city emergency organization non- <br />governmental agencies and organizations having resources necessary to <br />meet unforseeable emergency requirements. <br /> <br />With the Emergency Operating Center (E.O.C.) now located within the new <br />police facility several operating advantages over the previously identified <br />E.O.C. have become apparent. As a result, Staff has developed a new organ- <br />izational structure and operational concept to enhance emergency operations. <br />The plan is non-traditional in nature, unique in some aspects, but not en- <br />tirely a new concept, in the field of emergency preparedness. <br /> <br />Information <br /> <br />The new concept divides the emergency organization into three operating groups <br />i.e., the Policy Group, Services Group and Function Group; and calls for them <br />to work within three separate areas of the E.O.C. In the past, the organization <br />was divided into two groups; Direction and Control Group, and Coordination Group <br />both of which worked side by side in the E.O.C. This closeness, in itself, <br />created overlaps in authority which caused confusion, not to mention the noise <br /> <br />SR 84:187 <br /> <br /> <br />