Laserfiche WebLink
SR 84:144 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />11,2 Does the plan contain projections of conditions <br /> and provide for accommodating growth in the long- <br /> term? <br /> <br />1i.3 Does khe plan adequately address all locally <br /> relevant issues? <br /> <br />Does the plan adequately address the State mandated <br />requirements concerning housing,. open space, surface <br />mining, seismic zones, and environmental quality? <br /> <br />1~,5 Does t:l-~e pl. an contain adequate standards for land use <br /> intens.ity and population density for various <br /> categories of land use? <br /> <br />11.6 Does the plan contain a diagram showing proposed <br /> land uses for the entire planning area? <br /> <br />11.7 Is the plan internally consistent? <br /> <br />1.]_.8 Is the plan easy to read and available to all those <br /> concerned with the community's development? <br /> <br />_T_~_K.._?2?.:. ...._t~K___ep_a__r__e__' ~LkviL0__n._me_nt_a! __Imp_a_c_t' Repo r t <br /> <br />The evaluation of alternatives in Phase II will provide <br />much of the needed information for the EIR and will have <br />anticipated most of the mitigations and included them <br />as actions in the draft General Plan, This process should <br />reduce the size and complexity of the EIR and still provide <br />most of the data necessary to adequate].y evaluate the <br />impacts of the proposed General Plan and satisfy CEQA <br />requirements. Much of the technical data. used to <br />develop the Genera]_ Plan can be placed in the EIR or <br />an appendix, leaving the General Plan to concentrate <br />on [>ol. icies and i. mpleraentatiorx programs. The format <br />of the EiR wi].l follow CEQA guidelines. <br /> <br />12.] Review with City staff. and the public. <br /> <br /> <br />