My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
012009
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2009 2:35:16 PM
Creation date
1/14/2009 9:40:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
applicant installed the tank at its location. He noted that this case is troubling because it involves <br />one neighbor against another. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that the North Sycamore Specific Plan and the Happy Valley Specific <br />Plan talk about agriculture. She noted that there are design guidelines in place to ensure that the <br />agricultural character of the area is preserved. <br />Chair Blank noted that the old tank looked "farm-y" but that the new tank does not. <br />Commissioner Pearce commented that the new tank does not look like an old farm but like a new <br />farm. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the tank did not aesthetically fit on the site. She stated that she <br />could not see leaving it the way it is without any mitigation or screening because it does not <br />blend into the surrounding neighborhood. <br />Chair Blank stated that he believed there is a way to mitigate it so it blends into the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the color could be brown rather than green <br />Commission Pearce noted that she would be glad to discuss mitigation but would not like to <br />spend a lot of time on mitigation that the neighbors do not want. Commissioner Olson agreed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the applicant submitted a list of mitigation measures she was <br />willing to undertake, which included painting the tank or putting up a structure around it. He <br />added, however, that he did not think those measures were amenable to the neighbor. <br />Commissioner Pearce moved to make the required conditional use permit findings as listed <br />in the staff report and to approve PCUP-205, subject to the conditions of approval as listed <br />on Exhibit B of the staff report. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Fox indicated that she would not support the motion <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she was willing to consider changing the color because that is <br />the one mitigation that the neighbors did not dismiss. <br />Chair Blank noted that here are two neighbors who do not get along because one neighbor took <br />the shrubs out, but the applicant is willing to put some shrubs in. He stated that he thinks the <br />applicant should be encouraged to perform all the mitigations and that planting shrubs and <br />painting the tank are acceptable to him. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that she thinks the tank is too big and needs to be screened. She added <br />that she would like to see it covered on four sides with lattice. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 9, 2008 Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.