Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Narum agreed with Commissioner Pearce that it is a sad situation when neighbors <br />aze hostile towards one another. She noted that the property is zoned Agriculture which would <br />include a farm and things like water tanks. She indicated that she is not quite as concerned about <br />the Diamond Court residents as when they bought their houses at that location, they knew that it <br />was agricultural land on the other side of the fence. She inquired if putting back the solid fence <br />would make a difference. She indicated that she would be open to discussing some mitigation on <br />this water tank, such as planting some large bushes on the back side, although she is questioning <br />whether it was worth the effort since she did not think that was the answer to the problem. She <br />stated that as a chemical engineer, she believes it would be most efficient to locate the tank as <br />close to the pump as possible as the shorter distance would decrease the friction of the water to <br />the pipe. She concluded that unless she heard some compelling reason about mitigation, she <br />would grant the use permit and leave the tank where it is. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he is also a bit conflicted. He noted that if the application <br />came before the Commission before the tank was installed, there would have been more <br />opportunity to resolve some of the issues. He stated that he was not sure moving the tank 20 or <br />30 feet behind the gazage would have been a big issue; however, considering the timing of when <br />the tank was installed, the older photographs and what he saw when he was at the site, and the <br />removal of the trees, he noted that it could have been better screened if some of the existing <br />vegetation had been left in place. <br />In response to Commissioner Fox's comments about the growth of the redwood trees, he stated <br />that his brother has some redwood trees and that he would trim theirs trees up to give them space <br />underneath the tree. He stated that he was not a tree expert and did not know how much <br />vegetation there would be toward the ground if the trees were not trimmed and were allowed to <br />fill in. He added that if the case were really that the trees were going to be off the ground, there <br />were several types of shrubs that could be planted to screen the tank; however, he stated that he <br />did not know if the applicant or the rear neighbor should be responsible for planting those <br />shrubs. He noted that this was an agriculturally zoned area and that the applicants had met all <br />the setback requirements. <br />Chair Blank noted that historically, the Planning Commission has taken a firm line on projects <br />that applicants work on without permits. He expressed, however, that he was sympathetic with <br />someone who says that she had to replace an old water tank, consulted with a contractor, and <br />relied on the contractor to inform her of the requirement for a City permit. He noted that he was <br />surprised by the mass of the water tank as well as its color. He stated that, like Commissioner <br />Olson, he drove down Diamond Court and wondered what it would have been like if the fence <br />had been solid because the tank would not have been quite as visible. He noted that the redwood <br />trees are too small and would not provide any screening either. He further noted that the site is <br />zone Agriculture. <br />Chair Blank stated that mitigation such as additional landscaping, painting the tank a natural <br />earthtone color, or installing some lattice work around the tank might help the situation and that <br />he could support leaving the tank at its current location with the right mitigation measures in <br />place. He added that he is sensitive to the issue of efficiency and could understand why the <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Apri19, 2008 Page 1 I of 15 <br />