My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
012009
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2009 2:35:16 PM
Creation date
1/14/2009 9:40:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT B <br />AGREEMENT CONCERNING WATER TANK AT 48~ SYCAMORE ROAD <br />THIS AGREEMENT is made January , 2009 between Janny Rocha ~Rocha~, <br />Phillip and Joanna Segundo ~Segundo~, and the City of Pleasanton ~City~ concerning <br />the relocation of a water tank at 481 Sycamore Road, Pleasanton, California. <br />Recitals <br />A. Rocha is the owner of real property located at 481 Sycamore Road, <br />Pleasanton, California. <br />B. Segundo is the owner of real property located at 455 Sycamore Road, <br />Pleasanton, California. <br />C. A 10,ooo-gallon redwood water storage tank had been located on the Rocha <br />property. <br />D. In 2008, Rocha replaced the 10,ooo-gallon tank with a new 5,ooo-gallon <br />polyurethane green tank at a different location than the 10,ooo-gallon tank in order that <br />the new tank be located closer to the well on the Rocha property. <br />E. After the new tank was constructed, Segundo objected to its placement on <br />aesthetics grounds and because Rocha had not obtained a conditional use permit from <br />the City for the tank's relocation. <br />tank. <br />permit. <br />F. Thereafter, Rocha applied to the City for a conditional use permit for the new <br />G. on April 9, 2008, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the use <br />H. Segundo timely appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City <br />Council. <br />I. 0n A~~gust 19, 2008, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the <br />Segundo appeal; at the conclusion of that public hearing the City Council directed that <br />City staff work witr~ Rocha and Segundo and determine if a compromise could be <br />reached. <br />J. City staff met with Rocha and Segundo on numerous occasions in an effort to <br />find compromise. <br />K. That compromise has now been reached, and the parties wish to put the <br />comprorise into a binding agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.