My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
012009
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2009 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
1/13/2009 4:27:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and divided light windows and doors. Further heritage style is expressed through the <br />incorporation of a small front porch and balconies. <br />The proposed plan is consistent with the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines and <br />the project appropriately reflects the size, scale, and massing of the other existing <br />residential structures in this area of Downtown. As also required by the guidelines, the <br />locations of the garage entries are well screened. Furthermore, apedestrian-oriented <br />streetscape is maintained by keeping the existing structure at the current front yard <br />setback. <br />The proposed project was referred to the Pleasanton Heritage Association (PHA) for <br />review and comment. The PHA reviews projects utilizing the City's Downtown Specific <br />Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines. The PHA was supportive of the project and <br />provided suggestions and recommendations for consideration. Furthermore, the PHA <br />stated that the project, as proposed, is an example of the intent of the Downtown <br />Specific Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines providing a letter of support <br />(Attachment 5). Staff and the applicant agree with the PHA's recommendations, as <br />outlined in the letter and conditions of approval have been added. (Attachment 1: <br />Exhibit B). <br />Existing Trees <br />An arborist report was prepared for the five trees on the subject site; two Black Walnut <br />trees and one English Walnut tree along the eastern portion of the driveway and one <br />Black Walnut tree and one English Walnut tree in the southeast portion of the property. <br />Although the arborist report recommends removal of one of the three trees located at <br />the front of the property, Planning staff does not agree with the conclusion that the tree <br />needs to be removed and has added a condition of approval that the tree shall not be <br />removed. The City's Landscape Architect has reviewed the report and conducted a site <br />inspection and agrees with Planning staffs recommendation. <br />The two trees located at the rear of the property were also recommended by the arborist <br />for removal due to their current condition as well as their proximity to the proposed new <br />rear units. The trees would not likely be able to sustain the impacts of construction as <br />walnut trees are sensitive to such activities. The property owners shall remove the iwo <br />rear trees and pay into the Urban Forestry Fund in the amount of the appraised value of <br />the trees. They will also be required to post a bond for the three trees that shall be <br />retained. <br />Ooen Space <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code requires a minimum of 300 square-feet per dwelling <br />unit for group and private usable open space in the RM district. A PUD zoning, <br />however, is designed to provide flexibility in development standards to allow innovative <br />design for projects that otherwise meet the intent of the General Plan, relevant Specific <br />Plan, and, in this case, the Downtown Design Guidelines. <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.