My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 84105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
RES 84105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2012 12:46:39 PM
Creation date
1/20/2000 11:50:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/28/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, <br /> <br />MEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />MEREAS, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 84-105 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPEAL OF DONALD BEEMAN <br />TO A DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I,~HICH <br />DENIED A VARIANCE TO ALLOW OCCUPANCY OF A MOBILE <br />HOME AT 8011 DOROTHEA COURT <br /> <br />at its meeting of January 25, 1984, the Board of <br />Adjustment denied Case AP-84-1, an application by <br />Donald Beeman for a variance to allow occupancy of <br />a mobile home on a single-family lot located at <br />8011 Dorothea Court for an ei,ght to twelve month <br />period while a permanent residence is being constructed <br />on the property; and <br /> <br />within the time specified by the Ordinance Code of <br />the City of Pleasanton, the applicant submitted an <br />appeal to the decision of the Board of Adjustment <br />to the City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br />at its meeting of February 28, 1984, the City <br />Council reviewed a report dated February 23, 1984 <br />from the Director of ~lanning and Community Development <br />together with copies of staff reports to the Board <br />of Adjustment regarding this matter; and <br /> <br />the City Council held a public hearing at which <br />time the applicant and any other member of the <br />public was offered an opportunity to present <br />evidence regarding this appeal; and <br /> <br />after a review of the material presented, the City <br />Council makes the following findings: <br /> <br />That because there are special circumstances <br />having to do with the efficient utilization <br />of the subject property, the strict application <br />of the provisions of the Code would deprive <br />the property owner of privileges enjoyed by <br />other properties in the vicinity and under <br />identical zoning classification. <br /> <br />That because of the special circumstances <br />mentioned in paragraph (a) above, the granting <br />of the variance will not constitute a grant <br />of special privilege inconsistent with the <br />limitation on other properties classified in <br />the same zoning district. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.