Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she thinks he could have up to 20 children. <br />Ms. Decker replied that based on the operations as described for the hours, Mr. Pfund <br />can have up to 20 children but it is the number of hours the Commission is considering <br />that each child can only be there up to 16 hours only. She noted that Mr. Pfund can <br />have 20 children on site, but they may not attend more than 16 hours, which would <br />allow Mr. Pfund a type of business and maintain these hours as identified and agreed <br />upon with conditions. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that if Mr. Pfund is granted a temporary use permit through <br />end of school year to give him time to get daycare license, and if he does not get <br />everything together until June 1ST but wants his business permit based on having a <br />daycare license, which would trigger an E-occupancy which takes about four weeks, it <br />would put him beyond the six-month temporary permit period. She inquired whether the <br />Commission would want a condition for him to start figuring out how to satisfy the <br />E-occupancy so that his six-month permit does not run out while meeting all the other <br />things that are dependent on one another. <br />Chair Blank stated that if Mr. Pfund does not have his childcare license and background <br />check by March or April, he should be going after the State and in May, he could come <br />back to the City with all of his documentation about what he has done, and then the <br />Commission can act on it at that time. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired, if the Commission gives Mr. Pfund a temporary use <br />permit until end of June and if as soon as he gets his license, he wants to be sure he is <br />an E occupancy, if staff would begin working to determine what needs to be done. <br />Mr. Thomas said yes. He stated that Mr. Pfund and the property owner have already <br />come in to talk about what the potential requirements are for an E-occupancy and are <br />working with an architect to do this. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Mr. Thomas if he would still work with Mr. Pfund, even if he <br />has not completed his documents, to do whatever is necessary to meet the <br />E-occupancy. Mr. Thomas said yes. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the Commission could also consider approving this <br />as is, under 16 hours, rather than putting asix-month time limit. Chair Blank recalled <br />that this was the original premise before the Commission. Commissioner Olson <br />inquired if a limit is necessary on the temporary time and if Mr. Pfund could just continue <br />with the 16 hours if he does not have a child care license. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that this was a good point and referred to Ms. Decker's <br />comment about having some kind of review. She suggested that if the Commission <br />does approve this in some form, the Commission review it around April 1sr <br />uRNr ~ cn~trcr i ~: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/12/2008 Page 20 of 25 <br />