Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />ATTACHMENT 8 <br />PCUP-229. John Pfund. Tri-Valley Martial Arts Academy <br />Application for a conditional use permit to allow the operation of the following at <br />1262 Quarry Lane, Suite A, in the Valley Business Park: (1) a martial <br />arts/childcare facility, Monday through Friday, from 11:30 a.m. to 6:15 p.m.; <br />(2) full-time childcare program camps during school breaks and holidays; and <br />(3) evening martial arts classes, Monday through Friday, from 6:45 p.m. to 9:00 <br />p.m. Zoning for the property is PUD-I (Planned Unit Development -Industrial) <br />District. <br />Ms. Amos presented the staff report and noted that a project timeline dating back to <br />June 2007 was before the Commission. She then described the background, scope, <br />and key elements of the project. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired where the car parts business was located, and Ms. Amos <br />replied that this was located in a separate building and pointed it out on the displayed <br />map. She noted that Suite A is where the applicant is planning to locate; a potential <br />tenant will locate in Suite B, but staff is not aware of that use at this time; Liquid Coating <br />is operating in Suite C, and Novine Company is operating in Suite D. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the attachment to Question No. 97 lists the businesses on <br />Quarry Lane and has After Market Distributing in Suite C, and Liquid Coating in Suite D. <br />She stated that she believes Suite C is actually the car parts business. <br />Ms. Amos agreed with Commissioner Fox and acknowledged staffs error. <br />In response to Commissioner Fox's inquiry if the car parts business doing the lacquer <br />process was in Suite C, Ms. Amos replied that they do conduct lacquer applications. <br />She noted that there is a car operations center located in the building across from it. <br />Ms. Amos then discussed the applicant's operations and transportation services. She <br />added that there were questions submitted by Commissioner Fox, which she read out <br />loud as follows: <br />"1. Regarding the handgun referred to in the Dublin letter; can the police follow up <br />on whether it was loaded or unloaded? <br />"2. Regarding the location of the handgun, can the police follow up on whether it was <br />locked or unlocked? <br />"3. Regarding the location of the handgun, can the police follow up on whether it was <br />out in the open or not?" <br />Ms. Amos responded to questions, stating that the information is not available to the <br />public and that the applicant would be able to respond and clarify. <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/12/2008 Page 1 of 25 <br />