My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
121608
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2009 1:08:23 PM
Creation date
12/10/2008 5:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Blank stated that the cabinets would have to be placed on the ground. <br />Mr. Reeves noted that the space is the existing tower in very limited and would not <br />accommodate all of the equipment. He added that they also tried the 15 -foot tall <br />flagpole, and their capacity dropped significantly. <br />Chair Blank inquired whether there was any change to the current dimensions of the <br />current tower other than the cupola in terms of height and width. Mr. Reeves said there <br />were none. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the Auf der Maur property, where the Home Depot was <br />being proposed, is located across the street from McDonald's. She inquired if, in the <br />event the T- Mobile wireless facility is approved, a church with a childcare center and /or <br />a senior care facility would never be able to be approved on that property. <br />Ms. Decker replied that it would not necessarily be the case, but it would need to be <br />sited 300 feet from this antenna. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that if the Commission approves the antenna, there will be a <br />situation then where at least a portion of the Auf der Maur property close to the antenna <br />would be limited with respect to what could go there forever or for as long as the <br />antennas are there. <br />Chair Blank stated that it might be helpful in the future for cases like this for the <br />Commission to get a 300 -foot radius circle on a map to assist the Commission in <br />making its decision. He noted that this is a major entryway into the City and that the <br />design does not look appealing to him. He indicated that he wished there were some <br />way to work this one out but that he cannot think of one without having to put more <br />mass on that tower. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that he felt there were alternatives for places to locate the <br />antennas. She indicated that if trails go up in the Oak Grove location, one of the most <br />prominent buildings from the hillside would be the McDonald's building. She noted that <br />morphing the building to put a cell phone tower is not appropriate for that gateway <br />location, particularly since there may be alternate locations close by that could meet the <br />same requirements, such as at some of the self- storage locations. She added that <br />there could also be flagpoles or stealth trees at the back of some of the self- storage <br />units that would not be visible to the public. So stated that she would not support the <br />project. <br />Commissioner Pearce expressed concern about the visuals and agreed that the two <br />pictures do not look like they are from the same photo. She stated that she agreed with <br />Commissioner Fox's concern that this project adds a fairly significant limitation to the <br />property across the street, noting that uses related to children or seniors cannot be put <br />on that property within 300 feet of the antenna. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.