Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 4 <br />Mr. Wolfe iodic at the restroom problem was due to th unt of use by vazious residents and <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />sports group that snack baz electrical overloading iss ere the result of equipment now being <br />used by t rts groups. If the Commission desires, ommendation could be made to City C tl <br />for fu to upgrade these facilities as a Capital I ement Project (CIP). He also agreed t <br />upda ould be provided regarding weather co ns on the City's website, and suggeste t Internet <br />access be discussed at the Sports Council. <br />There were none. <br />MATTERS BEFORE THE COMMISSION <br />A. Discussion of Proposed Operational Changes for Pleasanton Pioneer Cemetery <br />Mr. Wolfe advised that the former Pleasanton Memorial Gardens Cemetery was owned and operated for <br />many years by the International Order of Odd Fellows (IOOF) Lodge No. 255. In 2005, a residents group <br />was concerned about the facility's condition and organized Pleasanton Pioneer Cemetery, Inc. (Pioneers), <br />a non-profit organization formed to acquire and improve the cemetery. <br />The Pioneer's approached the City about acquiring and maintaining the Cemetery after discovering the <br />difficulty in complying with the numerous State regulations required. After considerable research, the <br />City Council agreed to acquire and manage the facility, and the purchase was completed in early 2007. <br />After taking possession of the Cemetery it was renamed "Pleasanton Pioneer Cemetery", and the City's <br />Parks Maintenance Division began extensive site improvements to bring the facility to an acceptable <br />standard. The City also contracted with Catholic Funeral Cemetery Services (CFCs) to assist in <br />researching and organizing the administrative records received when acquired. A preliminary database of <br />existing burials has been established, locator plot map created, and the City's Geographic Information <br />Systems (GIs) Division is verifying visible plot locations and grave market information against the <br />database. <br />Because of State compliance requirements related to the operation of cemeteries, the City decided to <br />contract with CFCs to handle burial services. With the exemption of several families/individuals that <br />purchased "pre-need" services, all burial costs aze the responsibility of each individual plot owner and <br />were not included with the original purchase. When the Cemetery was acquired, the City Council <br />determined that on-going maintenance would be performed at a "pioneer" (non-landscaped) standard. <br />Based on estimates at that time, capitals costs of approximately $742,000 would be required to raise the <br />level of the Cemetery to a "landscaped" standard, and $75,400 annually to maintain the site. <br />Since the acquisition, inquiries have been made by members of the community about possibly improving <br />the Cemetery to a "landscaped" standard, and having additional plots made available. Staff recently <br />reviewed costs to bring the Cemetery up to a higher standazd and the revised estimate is now <br />approximately $990,000 in capital costs, with $85,000 being required annually for maintenance expenses. <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Minu[es <br />October 9, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br />