Laserfiche WebLink
7.2. Fiscal Impact of Including Assisted Living Unite in the Housing Cap Count <br />Impact on a pmy~tiVe Aaaia39 <br />The Initiative defines a housing unit to include any residences that have a kitchen (sink, <br />cooking device, and refrigerator) and a bathroom (toilet, tub or shower). The statement <br />of reasons section of the Initiative states that the Pleasanton definition of housing unit <br />should be consisted with the U.S. Census Bureau and State of California definitions <br />when calculating the housing cap. <br />Staff looked at development plaened in the neat future that, depending upon this <br />application of this definition, may trigger this section of the Initiative; the one project <br />identified is the Continuing Life Care (CLC) project planned for the Staples Ranch <br />PrnP~3'• CLC proposes to build 636 units that would include independent living units, <br />villas and apattrnents. To date, the City Council has indicated that 240 of the 636 units <br />would count towards the City's housing cap; however a final decision will not be made <br />on that issue until Council considers the PUD development plan for the CLC facility. ht <br />the meantime, for other purposes, staff has been counting 240 units from CLC towards <br />the housing cap consistent with the Council's preliminary direction <br />If, however, the Initiative were adopted and a11636 units were determined to fall within <br />the Initiative's definition of a "housing unit" and count toward the City's housing cap, <br />this would cause a reduction of an additional 396 units (that is, in addition to the 240 staff <br />has been counting) in the number of future housing units that could be developed in the <br />City under the housing cap. This would create a loss in annual net revenues to the City, <br />as well as upfront capital few (development impact fees), as follows: <br />Houslnp Unk Assumptlons: <br />MuMl/amly Unltt't <br />Floor Ana: <br />Coat pat square foot: <br />Estlmatsd Market Value: <br />Parson Par HousahoW: m <br />900 square feat <br />5250 <br />5225,000 <br />2.0 <br />3lnpla Famliy <br />gKachsd UnNro <br />3,500 square test <br />5350 <br />51,22a,ooo <br />3.0 <br />(1) Based on Windsor Apartment Project 350 unit ranyiny from 578 square feat to 1,388 aquaro feet; <br />of the 360 unNs 213 unib an ores bsdroorn/ons bath, 130 an taro bsd-comsAwo baths and 7 aro three <br />bedroomsMres baths. <br />(2) Based on fha Ironwood Protect 191 unib ranyirty from 1,450 aquaro feet to 3,091 aquae feet <br />(3) Per State of CalHbmia Department of Flnanca as d January 1, 2008: 2.753 parsons per househod In <br />Pleasanton. Pa U.3. Csnsw: owner axupied 2.87 parsons per household and rooter occupied 2.3 <br />persons par ltousshoW. <br />Per 1998 General Plan: 3.09 persons par aMpb famiy household and 2.05 peroons per multlhmily <br />'s 71~e analysis Drily comiders the apptieation o[ the datloitioa of houriag unit ao ^ pmapective basis <br />because the Initladw did not include speeitie lanpap about rotrweavity. <br />35 <br />