Laserfiche WebLink
Note: The fiscal analysis for this section of the Initiative is unrelated to the development <br />of hillside homes; therefore, the fiscal analysis only looks at the impacts of multifamily <br />units and single family detached units (which was shown is Table 1) and reproduced here <br />in Table 9 (deleting the information related to hillside homes). <br />Table 10 presents the operating impact if the number of remaining housing units was <br />reduced by 396 (by counting 396 additional CLC units) towards the City's housing cap: <br />TabN 10 <br />Rwenua <br />Property Tax <br />Salsa Tax <br />Total Mnual Rwenuss <br />Expenditures <br />ToW Annual Expendkuros <br />Net Addltionsl Revenues <br />Maximum Reducflon <br />Mukifamly SInpN Famlly <br />i 228,314.00 i 1,232,154.00 <br />E 231.572.8fl Z 347.369.32 <br />3 457,888.88 Z 1,579,813.32 <br />i 193,513.32 <br />Based on the analysis in Table 10, the reduction in annual net revenues to the City by <br />counting an additiona1396 CLC units towards the City's housing cap (by assuming that <br />~ese units fall within the Initiative's definition of housing unit) ranges from 5101,000 <br />annually (based on 100'/. of the homes that would otherwise be built being multifamily) <br />to 5194,000 (based on 100'X. of the homes that would otherwise be built being the <br />family). The actual reduction in annual net revenues to the City is dependen <br />actual mix of homes ultimately developed. <br />36 <br />