My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
121608
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2008 4:39:00 PM
Creation date
12/10/2008 4:29:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is close to build-out, community-wide traffic patterns and intersection levels-of-service <br />an mainly determined Shifting approximately 119 to 224 units from hill areas to flatter <br />in-fill areas, which equates to 119 - 224 trips during the peak hours and 1,190 - 2,240 <br />trips per day, will have little effect on the community overall. The Initiative would result <br />in reduced traffic on some local strcets immediately adjacent to the above-listed hill area <br />properties wmpared to the traffic on those streets resulting from development as <br />currently allowed under the General Plan. <br />The Initiative could reduce the future growth of new traffic if the definition of housing <br />unit is given as expansive application to use not previously counted against the housing <br />cap, such as assisted living facilities, thereby educing the number of new housing units <br />which can be built. The amount of the reduction would likely be de minimis when <br />considered in perspective with all residential and commercial traffic within tha City, and <br />undetected by the typical driver. <br />The continuation of local traffic conditions would wntinue in the Happy Valley loop area <br />if the Bypass Road is not constructed. This would occur if the Initiative wen interpreted <br />not to allow grading for roads on land with slopes of 25 % or more to serve new <br />development, or an interpretation that define the road as a structure due to the retaining <br />walla that might be needed for its construction. (See Sections 4.2, above, and 5.7, <br />below.) In addition, if Greenbrier Home' application to move the density on the <br />Spotomo property from the Upper Valley to the Flat is denied, then the limited <br />development potential under the Initiative in the Spotonw Upper Valley area would raise <br />the question as to how the Bypass Road would be funded and built. This, in rum, would <br />raise the question of how existing golf course and surrounding residential traffic would <br />be mitigated in the long-term. <br />Regarding traffic impacts resulting from the potential increased number of housing units <br />in the "receiver" areas, these areas would be subject to traffic studies for their <br />development proposals. If some of the approximately 119 -224 units wen to be <br />transferred to properties within the Hacienda Business Park, for example, these <br />transferred units would lx added to those already being proposed, for which traffic <br />analysis would have to wnsider. Whatever impacts the proposed units would create <br />would need to be identified and mitigated as a condition of development. However, to <br />the extent that multiple family residential development in close proximity to the BART <br />station replace large-lot hillside single family homes, the traffic generated by these units <br />would likely be less and the impacts reduced. <br />The Lutiative would seem to have little impact on the City's existing business districts. <br />Overall, them would be little change in the City's shopping patterns and expenditure, If <br />the housing units currently contemplated for the hill areas are moved to other areas of the <br />City as a result of the Initiative and if these an multiple family or smaller lot single <br />family units, then the property taxes sad salty taxes generated may likely be less. (See <br />Section 7, below.) <br />I1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.