15 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

4.4. Impact on the Usa of Vacant Parceh of Land The impact of the Initiative on vacant lead would be mainly limited to those hillside residential parcels listed in Section 4.1, above, and to potential "receiver parcels" which may benefit from the allocation of additional units. Without the Initiative, those hillside parcels would seek planned unit development (PUD) approval for a number of housing units based on their existing General Plan land use designations, as modified through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and public review process. If the Initiative is adopted, the development potential of these properties would be significantly reduced, in some cases to no more than ten units.n Table 1, above, shows the maximum development potential and the estimated numbers of housing units that would be possible under the Initiative, thus demonstrating the estimated impact of the Initiative. If those "lost" 119 to 224 hillside units then became available in other locations, such as the Downtown or within the Hacienda Business Park, those vacant "receiver" parcels would benefit by obtaining that additional density and increased development potential under the housing cap. However, to the extent that assisted living units are determined by the Initiative W count as housing unite under the housing cap, this increased development potential oa "receiver" parcels would be eliminated, and there would be fewer conventional housing units to be built under the housing sap. The impact on the use of vacant parcels of land would aL9o be felt by adjacent property owners. Reduced development potential on hill area properties would likewise reduce development impact on neighbors who would not experience the same extent of development as they now might expect. Similarly, adding more development to other "receiver" properties elsewhere in the City may create additional development impacts not currently planned for. Any such impacts would have to be mitigated as pert of the development process for "deceiver" Properties. 4.5. Impact on Apienltural Lands, Open 3pacq TrafIIe Congestion, and Ezistin= Bnsinesa I/istricb If the Initiative is adopted, then will be less development than anticipated in the General Plea on those hill area properties listed in Table 1. 'this will result in more open space on those properties than has been expected. although some development will still occur. To the extent that development on those properties is located on the relatively flat, lower portions of the sites, the remaining open space tttay continue to be used for grazing Purposes, thus increasing the amount of agricultural land in the hill areas. The impact of the hillside development provisions of t~ Initiative on traffic will not be significant from a citywide perspective. As stated above, the total numbs of residential units in the community as a whole will remain the same with or without the Lutia6ve; only the distribution sad type of units will change. Given that the City's residential land _~ See also Seetiooe S.l sad 5.16. 10