Laserfiche WebLink
Finding: The City desires upper and luxury housing like that <br /> proposed on hilly sites and is willing to allow such <br /> development when it meets a level of risk acceptable to the <br /> City. <br /> <br /> 4. Proposed development outside standard fire response time in <br /> high fire hazard area. <br /> <br /> Finding: Conditions of approval substantially lessen the <br /> impact of development in high fire hazard areas. <br /> <br /> Fact: Conditions No. 13, 14, 21, and 30 require mitigation <br /> measures be incorporated in building development acceptable <br /> to the Fire Chief. <br /> <br />5. Effect: Proposed development in area with insufficient water <br /> distribution/storage facilities <br /> <br /> Finding: Conditions of approval avoid the potentially <br /> significant effect. <br /> <br /> Fact: Condition No. 21 requires the project to construct the <br /> water distribution/storage facilities necessary to serve the <br /> site. <br /> <br />6. Effect: Grading approximately 500,000 cu. yds. in areas of <br /> potentially unstable slopes/soils <br /> <br /> Finding: The project has been revised to substantially <br /> lessen the amount of grading. <br /> <br /> Fact: The revised project eliminates 150,000-250,000 cu. <br /> yds. of grading. <br /> <br /> Fact: Conditions No. 2 and 10 require final grading <br /> plan/specifications approval be withheld until completion of <br /> further geotechnical studies. <br /> <br />7. Effect: Increased erosion and sediment deposition from <br /> graded area. <br /> <br /> Finding: Conditions of project substantially lessen the <br /> potential erosion and sedimentation deposition from graded <br /> areas. <br /> <br /> Fact: Revised project has eliminated considerable areas of <br /> grading. <br /> <br /> Fact: Conditions of approval require revegetation, <br /> preparation of erosion and sedimentation plan (Conditions 17 <br /> and 25). <br /> <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br /> <br />