PC 052808 - Laserfiche WebLink

With respect to the view from the site to Pleasanton ridge, Commissioner Fox asked whether the viewer would be able to see the ridge or four-story buildings. Mr. Rodriguez noted that was a good question, and that he would bring that back at the public hearing stage. He would like to take a photograph of that spot and drop a building in visually. Commissioner Fox believed that would be useful to the Commission if the visuals could be created from multiple places on the property. She requested that the street view from Downtown towards I-680 and Bernal Avenue be included in the presentation. She noted that she did not want the buildings to obscure the view of the ridge, in the same way that she did not want the lighted sports fields to do the same. She added that she believed that may be a condition and requested staff to verify. Mr. Rodriguez noted that it was valuable to re-evaluate these aspects of the project and added that had been done significantly since 2000. He noted that none of the building heights had been changed since 2000. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether the developer was tied into Safeway as a tenant or whether it could be Whole Foods, Mr. Trobbe noted that when they started to re-evaluate the project from a retail perspective and considered modifying the site, they believed that only two grocers would be capable of bringing the quality and style to the site: Safeway and Whole Foods. He noted that Whole Foods was focused on a deal in Dublin and would not come to Pleasanton. He noted that he had not been able to persuade Whole Foods to come to Pleasanton. He noted that there would be no other grocers on the balance of the property. With respect to the office buildings on the south side, Commissioner Fox inquired whether the applicants anticipated having eating establishments within walking distance or whether they would have to drive. Mr. Trobbe replied that he did not know the answer to that question. He added that with the assistance of staff and Larry Cannon, they tried to make the pedestrian connections as inviting as possible, utilizing shade trees and benches and creating sitting areas; they hoped to encourage people to stay on foot instead of using their cars. Commissioner Fox suggested moving the offices to the corner and inquired whether that would be a good idea. Mr. Rodriguez replied that he believed it would be critical to the retail use to hold a corner and noted that the ease of access would be critical with a corner location. He added that a central location would segment the project enough that there would be three projects and that from a marketing perspective, that would not move the goals of the prof ect forward. Chairperson Blank noted that the original project had eight buildings and that this prof ect had eight buildings, since one turned into a Safeway. He noted that the layout, square footage, and some of the uses had changed. Mr. Trobbe noted that he believed Chairperson Blank's assessment was correct and that they kept the two buildings along Valley Avenue and the two buildings that fronted I-680. He added that they did not alter PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 28, 2008 Page 8 of 17