PC 052808 - Laserfiche WebLink

those buildings at all and that two buildings at the south end would be broken up into three smaller buildings, which would allow more flexibility. Mr. Trobbe noted that he appreciated the valuable comments from the Commission and that they looked forward to working with staff as they move forward with this prof ect. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Chairperson Blank noted that staff provided seven questions for the Commission's comments. 1. Does the Planning Commission believe that the proposed project implements the applicable goals and policies of the Bernal Property Specific Plan for this proposed project? Commissioner Fox noted that she did not believe the gas station conformed to the Bernal Property Specific Plan and did not like the fuel station and wanted it to be removed from the project. She stated that she believed the prof ect looked pretty good and would like to see more connection to the Bernal property, with more of a transition to the rest of the Bernal property. She stated that she was unsure of the gateway and arch at the entrance, although she did not dislike it. She added that she would like to see, in place of the fuel station, a plaza with more green area, possibly apedestrian-only plaza similar to Main Street Green with the retail shops across the way. She would like it to be an eye- catching, heavily landscaped area going into Pleasanton, perhaps including a water feature, that would set the tone for getting off of Bernal Avenue and going into Pleasanton. Commissioner Pearce stated that she believed the proposed project implemented the applicable goals and policies of the Specific Plan. She expressed concern about light and glare and would like those issues further addressed in the application. She noted that it was very pedestrian-friendly and that she believed they had done everything possible to encourage pedestrians to use it. She indicated that she would like to see some bike parking. Commissioner Olson noted that the proposed project implemented the applicable goals and policies of the Specific Plan. He stated that he believed it was a reasonable approach. Commissioner Narum stated that the proposed prof ect implemented the applicable goals and policies of the Specific Plan, with the exception of whether the development should create a community focal point and gathering place. She expressed concern about the gathering place and stated that she would like to see a plaza with a fountain and seating area separate from a restaurant. She added that she did not believe restaurant seating provided a comparable amenity. She disclosed that she was on at least two Bernal property task forces, and was involved with the writing and visioning process. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 28, 2008 Page 9 of 17