Laserfiche WebLink
retail environment, would be a benefit. He noted that the office users looked for <br />amenities such as food service, dry cleaners, and other services that would capture trips in <br />such a way that additional trips would not be generated during the noon hour. He stated <br />that he believed this project interfaced with the open space better than the previous <br />project. He displayed a slide presentation that showed the architectural details of the <br />proposed project. He noted that the materials and colors were very warm and rich, <br />including stone, wood, exterior plaster, and larger glass elements that would make the <br />entry elements very open. He added that the interior spaces would be light and airy. He <br />noted that Safeway wished to make this their flagship store. He noted that over <br />36 percent of the site would be landscaped, with a number of outdoor dining and <br />pedestrian areas. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired why the brick elements were not used instead of stone. <br />He stated that the brick elements would tie the two projects closer together, as opposed to <br />being so different in look Mr. Rodriguez replied that they had both materials and that he <br />believed the stone and brick worked well together. He noted that if the Commission <br />believed that one material would be better, he would entertain that idea. He added that he <br />liked the idea of adding both brick and stone and that they were both integrated into the <br />retail center and the office building because it was a very large site. He noted that the <br />Downtown area had a large variety of finishes. He stated that they proposed both <br />materials to address the issues of scale. He expressed concern that using only one <br />material may diminish the integrity of the design since it was so large. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that he had not noticed both materials and had observed a <br />lot of stone in the office and a lot of brick in the retail. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired whether she would see a lot of parking if she were to look <br />from the open space south of the project toward the project. Mr. Rodriguez replied that <br />she would not and that they changed the parking scheme in order to screen the parking. <br />He noted that the walkway paths in the previous parking area would be heavily <br />landscaped, acting as a transition buffer. He noted that there was a lot of green as <br />compared to the previous project and that there would be some glimpses of asphalt and <br />cars. He noted that there must be adequate parking and that by increasing the landscaping <br />buffer, the screening would be increased. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired whether a representative from Safeway was present. <br />Mr. Trobbe replied that they were originally scheduled for April and that the Safeway <br />representatives had planned to attend at that time. He noted that they had a conflict for <br />this hearing but would attend in the future. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired about the fuel station and noted that every new Safeway he <br />had seen recently had a fuel station. He believed that was a key part of their retail <br />equation in order for the project to be economically viable. He noted that grocery stores <br />were extremely low-margin businesses and that it would make sense for them to sell fuel. <br />He noted that he was a bit put off when he received the package and saw the massing of <br />the buildings. He noted that the color renderings showing the barriers were well done. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 28, 2008 Page 6 of 17 <br />