PC 052808 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Blank wanted to see photomontages and noted that 12 feet seemed too high for a monument sign. He believed the applicant should be very sensitive to the Commission's strong desire not to have this use look like a truck stop. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether there was a current development agreement, Mr. Pavan replied that there was. Commissioner Olson requested that staff bring the agreement and its modifications to the next hearing. Mr. Pavan stated that he would. Commissioner Narum requested feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission or the Trails Ad Hoc Committee to ensure the trails would be tied to the pedestrian walkways as well as whether the half-circle was properly placed. She stated that that the Trails Ad Hoc Committee meetings were better attended than the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings because of the community interest. The Commissioners concurred with that suggestion and indicated that they would like to have that happen before the project came back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Pearce would like more information on cities that have two Safeway's as well as cities of a similar size that can support eight grocery stores. She stated that she believed Safeway had performed its research and economic analysis. With respect to Commissioner Olson's question about the development agreement, Ms. Decker stated that as part of the entitlements, the applicant had requested an extension of the existing development agreement, which will include language updating the document. The document will expire in 2010, and the applicant has requested an extension to 2015. She noted that staff would discuss the office structures with the applicant and added that the office buildings were part of the development agreement, with the architecture as shown. She noted that with respect to Commissioner Pearce's request for a market analysis, Safeway has performed such an analysis. She added that staff will return with several fiscal analyses, including the impact of this development on other businesses, as well as what other revenues would likely be. She added that color samples and renderings would be presented as well. No action was taken. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Note: Staff confirms any proposed changes by reviewing the recorded proceedings prior to finalizing the Minutes.) Chairperson Blank noted that the second and third sentences under Section 3.2, Air ualit on page 11 be modified to read as follows: "He indicated that he knows the concentrations of carbon monoxide or hydrocarbons would be addressed but that not a lot of people know that leaded fuel is used in general aviation aircraft ~'~ °°°' r^T-~°r°'' rr' ~ r °° ~ ~ ° ° ~ ' ~* ~~ ~ ~ °' . He stated that he would like to make sure that the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 28, 2008 Page 15 of 17