PC 042308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Decker said no and noted that staff had called the applicants and was unable to reach them. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether staff would obtain a written confirmation that they would be in attendance before the item would be rescheduled, Ms. Decker replied that staff would. She added that another option would be to open the public hearing for the item and continue it so it would not need to be renoticed. She noted that some comments from the neighbors regarding the project had been received. Chair Blank indicated that he would prefer the item to be renoticed. Commissioner Narum agreed that the item should be renoticed. c. PSPA-02/PUD-02-07M/PCUP-210, Scott Trobbe, Pleasanton Gateway, LLC Work session to review and provide comment for a proposal to modify the Bernal Property Phase I Specific Plan and the approved PUD development plan and for a conditional use permit for aoommercial/office development on an approximately 39.22-acre property located on the southwest corner of Bernal Avenue and Valley Avenue, between Valley Avenue and I-680. Zoning for the property is PUD-C (Planned Unit Development -Commercial) District. This item has been continued to a future meeting. 7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS a. Discussion of the types of projects to be placed on the Consent Calendar. No discussion was held or action taken. A~endizin~ Discussion of Sports Courts and RV Parkin Chair Blank inquired whether a discussion of RVs and sports courts could be scheduled as two separate items so the Commission may receive public input and feedback on those items. Ms. Decker noted that a workshop had been held with the Planning Commission with respect to sports courts and added that in February, the Planning Commission had indicated its desire to revisit what had been discussed because of the ongoing litigation that had become part of the discussion. She noted that the previous information had been reissued with a memo to the Planning Commission, and staff had hoped to return with another workshop. She noted that due to the scheduling and the impacted calendar, staff had not been able to bring it back. She stated that the litigation had been completed and that she had not been aware of where it was in the process. She noted that staff would be able to bring that information back. Chair Blank inquired whether it would be useful to have staff review the public record of the litigation. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2008 Page 24 of 28