PC 042308 - Laserfiche WebLink

there would be no parking available for use. Staff felt that for the limited number of spaces committed to the retail use, a counter would be unnecessary. Ms. Decker inquired if the Planning Commission desired to include the memorandum with the modified conditions. Commissioner Narum moved to amend the motion to include the memorandum dated Apri123, 2008, modifying the conditions of approval in Attachment C. The amendment was acceptable to Commissioner Pearce. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. NOES: Commissioner Fox. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Olson. Resolutions Nos. PC-2008-19 recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, PC-2008-20 recommending approval of PGPA-13, and PC-2008-21 recommending approval of PUD-62 were entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Fox clarified that she voted "No" because she believed that a grocery store should have been mandated rather than saying it was a permitted use. She noted that the Planning Commission had an opportunity to put in the retail uses that will minimize traffic and make it as much of a TOD as possible and that she believed the Planning Commission should have a list of permitted commercial uses that could be narrowed down to the high-traffic types of uses that the City would like to see as part of the TOD in the first couple of workshops. She expressed concern about the parking and the contingency with the I-580/I-680 flyover and what the fallback position would be. She stated that she did not get a good answer as to the solution and would have liked to have seen more alternatives presented if CalTrans did get the land and wanted to do the flyover. She noted that she was also uncomfortable with the parking situation. b. PUD-99-O1-07M, Jun Kim Application for a maj or modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan to reduce the rear and side yard setbacks for a water feature at the property located at 8024 Oak Creek Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD-R/LDR (Planned Unit Development - Rural/Low Density Residential) District. Ms. Decker advised that the applicant for this item was not present and requested that this item be continued to the next available date as it was not the City's practice to hear an item without the applicant in attendance. Commissioner Fox noted that had occurred previously and inquired whether staff was aware that the applicant would not be in attendance. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2008 Page 23 of 28