PC 042308 - Laserfiche WebLink

working relationship with BART. He noted that they had heard many comments regarding the desired "look" of Pleasanton. He displayed a PowerPoint presentation describing the landscaping and emergency vehicle access (EVA). He noted that this was a gateway prof ect for Pleasanton and that it was important to make an impact statement to the BART patrons. Therefore, they increased the EVA access width over the existing access at the BART garage. He noted that Windstar was very conscious of the City's Green Building Ordinance requirements and had exceeded the minimum 50 points that are required. He added that they were currently in the mid-70s in LEED points and that they intended to increase that number substantially as the design was finalized. Mr. Heffner noted that they increased the affordability on this prof ect from the City's mandated 15 percent to 20 percent for 50 percent of the AMI, very low income wage earners. He noted that this prof ect held a 95-year ground lease with BART, with 93 years remaining. He stated that all the units would remain as rental units throughout the term of the lease and would not be converted to condominiums. He added that they intended to provide office space for both the Pleasanton Police Department and BART Police Department on the promenade, which would add security for the residents as well as for the BART patrons. He indicated that the BART police would parkin its own parking garage, and the Pleasanton police were free to park wherever they wished. Mr. Heffner advised that they had received a letter of intent from the grocer for the space, although he was not at liberty to divulge the identity of the grocer. He noted that it was a well-known name and that this prof ect fit its urban concept. He added that they were extremely excited to put the deal together with the grocer. He noted that this was apublic/private partnership as a TOD project. He noted that he believed that a TOD project would be timely and that it was even more important as gas pushed through the $4.00-per-gallon level. He noted that they had provided parking spaces above and beyond the ratio recommended by the parking study. He added that while they recognized that the automobile was heavily used in California, he believed a good quality of life could be attained in the TOD without the use of the automobile. Mr. Heffner did not know whether CalTrans would ever take the space behind the project and that although he did not anticipate it, they could do it. He noted that if there was demand for the flyover space in 20 to 25 years, the gas price level may be much higher. He believed that public transit would become more heavily used by that time. He stated that he hoped that people would be able to live by the green principles that they supported and that by that time, many cars would be removed from the road and that there would be less carbon dioxide in the air. He noted that this prof ect was sustainable not only by using green building standards, use of mass transit, but also by the fact that 20 percent of the residents would not need an automobile if they had a j ob in San Francisco as they would be able to take BART to San Francisco and back. He stated that the time had come for a premier TOD project. He noted that having a BART station less than 150 feet away from the development was an important aspect of the project. Commissioner Pearce stated that she would like to speak to a consultant about the tot lot and inquired who the appropriate person might be. Mr. Heffner replied that the prof ect landscape PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2008 Page 15 of 28