Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Decker noted because that the period of time the State may or may not take to <br />grant a childcare license is not in the control of the applicant or the City, she would like <br />the Planning Commission to consider that if the Commission were to grant a temporary <br />permit for asix-month period, it also craft similar language that the applicant would <br />revisit the Planning Commission after six months and provide information on his <br />operations and monitoring, such as attendance, hours children are there, how many <br />students are in each class, etc., as it is possible that after six months, Mr. Pfund is still <br />undergoing the process and does not have a license. <br />Commissioner Fox questioned if the number of students for an E occupancy was six. <br />Mr. Thomas replied that the commentary to the Code under E educational occupancy <br />talks about pre-school age children age 2.5 to 5 years, which are the concern, and <br />Mr. Pfund does not teach pre-schoolers. He explained that going from an E business <br />occupancy to an E with smaller numbers would have to do with pre-schoolers in the <br />concept that they need further assistance with exiting from the space. He noted that if <br />the numbers are maintained until it changes, it would be reviewed and plan checked as <br />an E occupancy and would not bean issue until the applicant gets enough students. <br />He noted that having a license provides the ability to extend the 16 hours. <br />Commissioner Olson suggested that if this is set up on a temporary basis, a condition <br />be crafted to say that it will be 16 hours or less until such time that Mr. Pfund obtains his <br />childcare license, which would also trigger the E-occupancy. <br />Chair Blank discussed the scenario of getting a business license and childcare license <br />as well as the triggers for E-occupancy. He stated that he believes that in order to <br />make this work, it should be kept as simple as possible. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she thinks he could have up to 20 children. <br />Ms. Decker replied that based on the operations as described for the hours, Mr. Pfund <br />can have up to 20 children but it is the number of hours the Commission is considering <br />that each child can only be there up to 16 hours only. She noted that Mr. Pfund can <br />have 20 children on site, but they may not attend more than 16 hours, which would <br />allow Mr. Pfund a type of business and maintain these hours as identified and agreed <br />upon with conditions. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that if Mr. Pfund is granted a temporary use permit through <br />end of school year to give him time to get daycare license, and if he does not get <br />everything together until June 1 St but wants his business permit based on having a <br />daycare license, which would trigger an E-occupancy which takes about fourweeks, it <br />would put him beyond the six-month temporary permit period. She inquired whether the <br />Commission would want a condition for him to start figuring out how to satisfy the <br />E-occupancy so that his six-month permit does not run out while meeting all the other <br />things that are dependent on one another. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2008 Page 22 of 29 <br />