Laserfiche WebLink
within that program over 16 hours per week. She added that this is the condition seen <br />on the most recent applications. <br />In response to Chair Blank's inquiry if the hours get spread out, Ms. Decker said yes <br />and added that the same is applicable even through the camps during the winter. She <br />indicated that it is a matter of the applicant managing the schedule and monitoring how <br />many hours each child is there. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that a sentence could be added at the end of Condition No. 4 that <br />states, "Until such time as the daycare license is obtained, no student could attend more <br />than 16 hours." Commissioner O'Connor suggested adding "students underthe age of <br />12." Ms. Decker stated that this would only be applicable to the afternoon sessions <br />which are shown under times for Condition No. 4 for "students aged 12 and under." <br />City Attorney Seto stated that it could more generally be written to say, "during this <br />temporary period," and the program would have to be modified and the conditions <br />modified to meet the childcare exemption criteria. She indicated that the applicant could <br />submit the program information to staff, and staff could continue to verify this during the <br />monitoring period. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if this could be appealed to the City Council or if it would <br />automatically go to the City Council. Ms. Seto replied that this is a conditional use <br />permit and the Planning Commission has the final decision on this, unless it was <br />appealed to the City Council. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired, should the Commission go in the direction of allowing <br />Mr. Pfund to open with a child not being there more than 16 hours a week, if this would <br />give the applicant time to sort through what is needed for the E-occupancy so it would <br />be on a parallel path. Mr. Dolan replied that it would, although the applicant would not <br />need anywhere near 6 months to address that issue. Chair Blank stated that it would <br />be more like from fourto six weeks. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired, if the Commission grants the use permit saying a child <br />can be there up to 16 hours for up to six months and there is no appeal, if in theory, <br />Mr. Pfund could open once he has his business license and any fire or building <br />inspection he needs, but it would not be required that the building satisfy the E <br />occupancy before he gets the business permit under this direction. <br />Ms. Decker said this is correct and added that Condition No. 10 would need to be <br />modified to provide this. She stated that what staff has seen in the past when there is <br />limitation in the number of hours creating the exemption, a condition is added that if <br />there is modifications over and above 16 hours per week, a childcare license may be <br />required and application needs to be made to the State. She noted that this is a <br />standard condition on tutoring facilities and facilities with extended hours where the <br />limitation of 16 hours is granted. She added that this would provide the opportunity for a <br />six-month period based on exemptions seen and information from the State. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2008 Page 21 of 29 <br />