My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092408
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 092408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:10 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/24/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce stated that she felt this was beyond the scope of the appeal <br />and noted that she was not prepared to have a further discussion on windows. She <br />indicated that she wanted to limit the motion to the items contained in the appeal. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he believed the Commission has already limited <br />the amount of window displays to 25 percent of the window area. Mr. Otto agreed. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she felt that, in fairness, the building owner should <br />be allowed to comment on this added condition. Commissioner Fox stated that <br />when the Commission originally looked at the Kolln Hardware renovation, it <br />discussed that any changes made to the building would come before the Planning <br />Commission. She noted that it may not have been included in the conditions of <br />approval for the actual modifications but thought that it was discussed at that time <br />under Matters Initiated by Commission Members. <br />Chair Blank said he was willing to re-open the public hearing to allow the building <br />owner to make any comments. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Mr. Cornett noted that, as he had stated earlier, he restored that building to the nth <br />degree of what was originally there. He stated that on the Division Street side, there <br />is a drop in siding which had all fallen off, and there was nothing left; at the cupola, <br />there was only one piece left of that decorative design on the corner piece. He <br />stated that he had a man from England with a local office re-manufacture all of these <br />materials to the detail. He added that the bay window on Main Street to the left <br />going north has a large ornamental treatment inside that was reproduced by the <br />same consultant. He noted that they did the same Division Street side. He <br />indicated that everything that needs to be done to the exterior of the building has <br />been done, except the ATM. He stated that there are no exterior improvements left <br />and that he does not expect to return because he will never have anything changed <br />on the building. <br />Ms. Kimberly Smith assured Commissioner Fox that Comerica does not use glow in <br />the dark orange, pink, or green neon in their window signs. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Olson. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 28 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.