My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092408
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 092408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:10 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/24/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce moved to deny the appeal, Case PAP-125, thereby <br />upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval of PDR-725, subject to the <br />Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit B of the staff report. <br />Commission Pearce inquired if Exhibit A under Condition of Approval No. 1 includes <br />the display board showing the revised ATM machine design. Mr. Otto replied that <br />the board was just submitted at tonight's hearing. <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that she definitely likes the design, material, and <br />trash drop. Mr. Otto confirmed that this was the same materials presented in the <br />original application and that the design with the trash receptacle on the bottom is <br />shown on the elevations. <br />Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if the ATM would need an overhang to keep the rain out. <br />Mr. Otto replied that the building has an awning that projects out a couple of feet. <br />He noted that the applicants are not proposing an additional overhang, such as a <br />canvas awning, and that any new proposals would return to the Zoning Administrator <br />for review, which could then be appealed. <br />Chair Blank noted the high degree of sensitivity here because of its historic aspect. <br />Mr. Otto agreed and added that staff would probably not support adding an awning <br />over the ATM. He noted that staff was pleased that the old aluminum awning was <br />removed. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if any new changes could come before the Planning <br />Commission because of the former Kolln Hardware building is important to the City. <br />Ms. Decker replied that this can be added as a condition of approval to the Planning <br />Commission's action. She added that it is not on the original conditions of approval <br />under Phases I or II. <br />Commissioner Fox indicated that she was proposing this as an amendment to the <br />motion and that she would vote in favor of the project if changes to the building <br />would not go through the Zoning Administrator but directly to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Commissioners Pearce and O'Connor accepted the amendment. <br />Commissioner Fox proposed another amendment related to banks and window <br />signs. She stated that there are some windows on Main Street which use a lot of <br />window signage and huge paintings advertising interest rates. She requested that a <br />condition be added to prohibit that at this location. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 27 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.