Laserfiche WebLink
some intrusiveness on the sidewalk. He added that the corner location would have <br />a low impact on the building as all that will be done is replacing a piece of glass. <br />Chair Blank inquired if a fair amount of room was needed for the night drop. <br />Mr. Cahn replied that there are certain ADA requirements for the opening. He noted <br />that locating the night depository on Division Street as proposed would require less <br />space while having it up front would be disruptive to the floor plan, the staff offices, <br />and access to the self-service vaults; it would also require the elimination of the <br />conference room in order to create a door and secured room. He explained that the <br />present plan creates a flow with access to the conference room and visibility from <br />the sight lines and doors. He added that they try to keep the two together for <br />convenience to merchants and because some people withdraw money after they <br />make deposits. <br />Mr. Polcyn noted that this space is also a little smaller than what they would prefer. <br />Kimberly Smith, Construction Project Manager for Comerica Bank, noted that the <br />amount of bronze framing the ATM can be easily minimized. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether or not there will be security cameras off or <br />attached to the wall. Ms. Smith replied that they do not have exterior cameras and <br />noted that there would be one on the upper corner of the ATM. She noted the <br />location for trash and indicated that eliminating that would require them to place a <br />trash receptacle next to the ATM. Mr. Otto confirmed that there is a policy for a <br />trash receptacle. <br />Ms. Hoshen noted that this ATM is different and has a reduced profile. <br />Mr. Polcyn noted that the ATM seen on the slide screen has been slightly modified <br />and held up an updated picture with the trash receptacle at the bottom. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he supported the location as proposed. He <br />added that he preferred the design on the board rather than what was shown on the <br />screen. He noted that the actual material is a much darker bronze and more <br />antique-looking as opposed to the more gold look. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she initially was considering appealing this item <br />but noted that the staff report addressed all her concerns, including replacing the <br />window when Comerica leaves and making the siding split-staggered as opposed to <br />all on one line. She expressed concern about the parking but realized that there is <br />no ordinance for parking. She indicated that she felt the proposal has been <br />tastefully done and that she would support denying the appeal. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 25 of 41 <br />