My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072308
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 072308
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:51 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 12:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 072308
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which were proposed for the Kimberly Commons project. She noted that in that <br />case, the analyst re-evaluated the mitigations and found that other measures met <br />the noise analysis. She indicated, however, that the Commission can require <br />that the conditions of approval incorporate the recommendations of the noise <br />analysis and not allow this flexibility. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if the maximum dBA could be included or outlined <br />in the noise study and plotted into the conditions of approval to achieve flexibility. <br />Ms. Decker explained that both the Zoning Code and the General Plan require <br />the dBA rating for internal noise and how it is abated. She added that staff <br />believes that there may be other construction alternatives versus relying on <br />window ratings. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the third sentence of Condition No. 5 on page 1 <br />should be corrected to read: "The Director of Planning and Community <br />Development may approve earlier `start times'...." Referring to Condition No. 23, <br />he inquired if the required certified green home rating was 50 points. <br />Ms. Rondash said yes. He then noted that the Pleasanton Heritage Association <br />suggested that garages be constructed instead of carports and that the staff <br />report indicated that parking spaces are not to be used for storage. He inquired if <br />that was the reason for carports. <br />Ms. Rondash replied that the condition of approval is a standard condition and <br />addresses storage in both garages and carports. She explained that the carport <br />design evolved in response to providing on-site parking for existing homes and <br />the Downtown Design Guidelines provision that garages be placed at the rear of <br />the property so they do not become the focal point. She noted that given the <br />constraints of the homes and their placement on lots, it was a challenge to <br />provide covered parking without making it a focal point. She added that various <br />designs were reviewed with the applicant, resulting in the flat-roof design of an <br />open carport, a subdued look to a required covered parking space. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the 50 dBA for trains included the whistle blows. <br />Ms. Rondash said yes. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to storage for garages in the Downtown areas where <br />nothing is allowed except for automobile storage. She noted that Condition <br />No. 22 relates to RV's and trailers and inquired which conditions required that <br />carports only be used for storage of an automobile and not other materials. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that this was found in Condition No. 16. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if the addition of the word "carport" to this condition <br />would address the Pleasanton Heritage Association's comment. Ms. Rondash <br />replied that the condition could be reworded to indicate that all carports and <br />garages shall be free of storage and available for parking at all times." <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2008 Page 7 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.