My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052108 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 052108 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:21 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 052108
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum noted that the house on Whitehall Court had a timeframe imposed. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that was the only example she could think o£ Ms. Decker noted that <br />applicant was required to obtain the necessary building permits within 30 days, and the <br />construction would be completed within six months. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether that kind of condition could be added. <br />Chair Blank suggested that the applicant be required to get a building permit within 30 days, but <br />he did not believe the applicant could be compelled to complete the required construction, <br />although they maybe compelled to remove the pool. <br />Ms. Decker noted that it would not be desirable to condition the applicant to get a building <br />permit; they currently have an open building permit that has not been finaled because there have <br />been no inspections. She stated that in conditioning the project, the Planning Commission would <br />want to chart out a timeline with respect to inspection processes and required inspections based <br />upon the geotechnical report. <br />Commissioner Fox suggested adding a condition stating that the applicant will be required to <br />schedule inspections within six months. <br />Commissioner Olson suggested conditioning the relocation of the pool. <br />Chair Blank inquired whether it was reasonable to require the relocation of the pool to take place <br />within six calendar months. Ms. Decker noted that the Planning Commission may make that <br />recommendation. She noted that while the building permit had already been obtained, it would <br />be reasonable to condition the project that the difference between the original value and the <br />actual construction cost of the cost be paid within 30 days. <br />Commissioner Fox proposed an amendment to add a condition that the applicant will pay <br />the difference between the original value and the actual construction cost of the project be <br />paid within 30 days and a second condition that the applicant will relocate the pool within <br />six calendar months. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she could not support that amendment. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the requirement to drain to pool to two feet should be <br />addressed. <br />Commissioner Narum was concerned that the pool be drained. <br />Commissioner Olson was concerned that the pool be relocated. <br />Commissioner Fox modified the amendment to add a condition stating that the applicant <br />will pay the delta of the building permit fees within 30 days, a second condition that the <br />applicant will drain the pool to a depth of two feet within 30 days, and a third that the <br />applicant will relocate the pool within six calendar months. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 21, 2008 Page 25 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.